Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Elevated CO2 (1200 μmol·m -2 ·s -1) raised dark-period stomatal conductance in each cultivar.

A claim from 201 Effects of CO2 Enrichment on the Growth and Stomatal Conductance of Two Cultivars of Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 (1200 μmol·m -2 ·s -1) raised dark-period stomatal conductance in each cultivar.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
1200 μmol·m -2 ·s -1 CO 2e3
Outcome
stomatal conductancee3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
during the dark periode3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–28
e3

“during the dark period, stomatal conductance was higher for each cultivar grown at 1200 μmol·m -2 ·s -1 CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1088

Title

201 Effects of CO2 Enrichment on the Growth and Stomatal Conductance of Two Cultivars of Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

N.C. Yorio; G.W. Stutte; D.S. DeVilliers; et al. HortScience 2000. doi:10.21273/hortsci.35.3.425e

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-8a331c8701510ff1c5adbacd2edda2d3895d4a6160cac16c8c63ee3cc57d693f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.