Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The two NPK fertilizer levels did not differ significantly for maize traits in summer 2014.

A claim from Calibration and Validation of DSSAT V.4.6.1, CERES and CROPGROModels for Simulating No-Tillage in Central Delta, Egypt · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two NPK fertilizer levels did not differ significantly for maize traits in summer 2014.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
two fertilizer levelse0
Outcome
maize traitse0
Direction
no-significant differencee0
Qualifier
summer, 2014e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there are no-significant difference between the two fertilizer levels for maize traits in the third season (summer, 2014)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1315

Title

Calibration and Validation of DSSAT V.4.6.1, CERES and CROPGROModels for Simulating No-Tillage in Central Delta, Egypt

Harb OM; Abd El Hay GH; Hager MA Agrotechnology 2016. doi:10.4172/2168-9881.1000143

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-8a350fc93a6b2ca00aafb3d2c67f2b0592c1f37d1b2a469f0ac95bccf831f862 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 136 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

153 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.