Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Full recommended NPK doses significantly improved maize traits compared with half doses in summer 2013.

A claim from Calibration and Validation of DSSAT V.4.6.1, CERES and CROPGROModels for Simulating No-Tillage in Central Delta, Egypt · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended NPK doses significantly improved maize traits compared with half doses in summer 2013.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
100% of the recommended doses of NPKe0
Outcome
maize and broad bean traitse0
Direction
favorede0
Qualifier
summer 2013e0
Comparator
50% of the recommended dose of NPK fertilizerse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% of the recommended doses of NPK favored the values of the studied maize and broad bean traits significantly during summer 2013 and winter 2013/2014, as compared by 50% of the recommended dose of NPK fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1185

Title

Calibration and Validation of DSSAT V.4.6.1, CERES and CROPGROModels for Simulating No-Tillage in Central Delta, Egypt

Harb OM; Abd El Hay GH; Hager MA Agrotechnology 2016. doi:10.4172/2168-9881.1000143

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-ff228e0d0fa53b89662eaaa8ab1cabd9eb8ddcb29c5d1ca0e315abd3e34f69be · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

153 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.