Intervention effectmodel-written summary

calcium sulfate fertilizer increased garlic yield by 28.06% versus no calcium fertilizer.

A claim from Effects of Different Calcium Fertilizers on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Garlic · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

calcium sulfate fertilizer increased garlic yield by 28.06% versus no calcium fertilizer.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
calcium sulfate fertilizere0
Outcome
yield of garlic bulbe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.06%e0
Setting
all three sitese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mass and yield of garlic bulb of the treatment with calcium fertilizer increased significantly in all three sites,the order was calcium sulfate fertilizer treatmentcalcium chloride fertilizer treatmentcalcium superphosphate fertilizer treatmentcalcium magnesium phosphate fertilizer treatment,the yield of which increased by 28.06%,25.68%,23.84%,20.14%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–1072
t0

“Effects of Different Calcium Fertilizers on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80

Title

Effects of Different Calcium Fertilizers on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Garlic

Gao Su-lin 2014

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-8c979304e1360326c3afb2509460c59c98d5a9f443986d22a358567ea43b57f6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ

166 papers: 155 positive, 11 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.