Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under double seedlings, high density increased cassava yield by 65.07% against low density.

A claim from Effects of Planting Density and Ways of Left Seedling on Yield and Economic Benefit of Cassava · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under double seedlings, high density increased cassava yield by 65.07% against low density.

Treatment
high planting densitye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
65.07%e0
Comparator
low planting densitye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the way of left double seedlings,in comparison with the group of low planting density,the group of high planting density and the group of middle planting density respectively increased by 65.07% and 35.03% in yield,by 50.91% and 84.49% in output value,and by 84.40% and 138.97% in economic benefit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–1028
t0

“Effects of Planting Density and Ways of Left Seedling on Yield and Economic Benefit of Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94

Title

Effects of Planting Density and Ways of Left Seedling on Yield and Economic Benefit of Cassava

Lin Hong-xi Hunan Agricultural Sciences 2013

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-8cea700d6e1f0fefdb88dbc626a91931cdfa7b03a51a8b976183f04bfc36da0b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 17 positive, 6 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.