Claim · model-written summary
Maize grown after aerobic rice had significantly higher yields than maize grown after flooded rice.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Significantly higher yields were obtained in no‐till maize grown subsequent to the aerobic rice than flooded rice, possibly due to residual soil N and improved soil physical conditions”
Title
M. D. M. Kadiyala; R. S. Mylavarapu; Y. C. Li; et al. Agronomy Journal 2012. doi:10.2134/agronj2012.0148
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Aerobic rice cultivation resulted in 37 to 45% water savings compared with flooded rice.
- Intervention effect The total water applied in aerobic rice plots was lower than in flooded rice, at 967 and 645 mm.
- Observation Soil moisture in aerobic rice was maintained at –30 to –40 kPa throughout crop growth.
- Intervention effect Aerobic rice produced significantly lower grain yields than flooded rice in 2009 and 2010, with differences of 39 and 15.4%.
- Intervention effect Yields increased significantly with increased N rates up to 120 kg ha −1 in both rice systems.
- Mechanism The higher maize yield after aerobic rice is possibly due to residual soil N and improved soil physical conditions.