Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogen did not affect cotton yield in 2005.

A claim from Fertilization Strategies of Cotton in North Carolina · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen did not affect cotton yield in 2005.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, in 2005 N did not affect yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1659
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 28–34

Title

Fertilization Strategies of Cotton in North Carolina

Andrew David Hunt NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries) 2009

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-8d6d3876de07da324a29c3e184695e526cac5b2b9dde9dece7a3c561b18f2275 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 286 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

334 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.