Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Calcium, magnesium and phosphorus contents of alfalfa were not significantly affected by K, S, B or Mo fertilization.

A claim from Effect of potassium, sulfur, boron, and molybdenum fertilization on alfalfa production and herbage macronutrient contents · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium, magnesium and phosphorus contents of alfalfa were not significantly affected by K, S, B or Mo fertilization.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
K, S, B, or Mo fertilizatione3
Outcome
calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), or phosphorus (P) contente3
Direction
not significantly affectede3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–86
e3

“Alfalfa calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), or phosphorus (P) content was not significantly affected by K, S, B, or Mo fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1077

Title

Effect of potassium, sulfur, boron, and molybdenum fertilization on alfalfa production and herbage macronutrient contents

Khorshid Razmjoo; Paul R. Henderlong Journal of Plant Nutrition 1997. doi:10.1080/01904169709365367

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-8d82b59669d6f75d7f95a274b0e64c0c79e8250a85222aafe093a597e506cf67 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 18 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.