Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The interaction of zero tillage and poultry manure was the best combination to improve cowpea yield and above-ground biomass in the Sahel Savannah.

A claim from Efficacy study on the influence of manure and Tillage on Cowpea performance in a Sahel Savannah region of Nigeria · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of zero tillage and poultry manure was the best combination to improve cowpea yield and above-ground biomass in the Sahel Savannah.

Treatment
Interaction between ZT and PMe3
Outcome
Yield and Above Ground Biomasse3
Direction
improvee3
Qualifier
best combinatione3
Setting
Sahel Savannahe3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Interaction between ZT and PM proved to be the best combination to improve Cowpea farmers Yield and Above Ground Biomass for the farmers and their livestock in Sahel Savannah”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–947

Title

Efficacy study on the influence of manure and Tillage on Cowpea performance in a Sahel Savannah region of Nigeria

Mahmud SANİ; İbraheem ALHASSAN; Dantata, J. ISHAKU; et al. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 2019. doi:10.31015/jaefs.2019.4.1

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-8dd712fd502bf90d0440053375a6668d47b078c062db17ed9d778ca07ad7ba73 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

35 papers: 27 positive, 8 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.