Claim · model-written summary
SA application did not inhibit most growth traits relative to control across treated and untreated conditions.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“For most of the traits, SA and DPMP did not inhibit plant growth compared to control under treated and untreated conditions.”
t0“Forage Pea”
Title
Y. Bektas Legume Research - An International Journal 2022. doi:10.18805/lrf-655
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect SA foliar application significantly affected tap, lateral and total root lengths, lateral root count and root fresh weight.
- Intervention effect DPMP foliar application significantly affected tap, lateral and total root lengths, lateral root count and root fresh weight.
- Intervention effect DPMP application did not inhibit most growth traits relative to control across treated and untreated conditions.
- Intervention effect DPMP under unstressed conditions significantly increased average lateral root length.
- Intervention effect DPMP plants had average lateral root length of 5.57 cm plant-1, above SA at 4.53 cm plant-1.
- Intervention effect DPMP plants had average lateral root length of 5.57 cm plant-1, above control at 3.01 cm plant-1.
- Recommendation The authors suggest SA spraying at an optimal species-specific dose to reduce abiotic stress effects.
- Recommendation The authors suggest DPMP spraying at an optimal species-specific dose to reduce abiotic stress effects.
- Recommendation DPMP is proposed as a sustainable pesticide alternative and growth-enhancing agent.