Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Waterlogging following drought disrupted maize root respiration.

A claim from Thirsty, soaked, and thriving: Maize morpho-physiological and biochemical responses to sequential drought, waterlogging, and re-drying · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging following drought disrupted maize root respiration.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Waterlogging stress following droughte4
Outcome
root respiratione5
Direction
disruptede5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize morpho-physiological and biochemical responses to sequential drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–105
e4

“Waterlogging stress following drought, although alleviating some drought-induced damage, introduced oxygen deprivation in the rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1714
e5

“leading to disrupted root respiration, necrosis, and impaired nutrient acquisition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1798

Title

Thirsty, soaked, and thriving: Maize morpho-physiological and biochemical responses to sequential drought, waterlogging, and re-drying

Sanjida Sultana Keya; Md. Robyul Islam; Hanh Pham; et al. Plant Stress 2024. doi:10.1016/j.stress.2024.100722

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-8f1f5cf6cd2b24ab2dff48d3b5bc070d876e728face5cd876238e49d9cf7668b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

drought · physiology: respiration · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.