Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping did not effectively suppress rice hopper and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis populations.

A claim from Effect of rice/arrowhead(Sagittaria sagittifolia) intercropping on diseases, pests and yield of rice · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping did not effectively suppress rice hopper and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis populations.

Treatment
rice/arrowhead intercroppinge0
Interactor
rice hoppere0pest
Outcome
population growthe0
Direction
did not effectively suppresse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rice/arrowhead intercropping did not effectively suppress the population growth of rice hopper and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–803
t0

“yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100

Title

Effect of rice/arrowhead(Sagittaria sagittifolia) intercropping on diseases, pests and yield of rice

Liang Kaimin Zhongguo shengtai nongye xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-8fac89e7611eff95c95948a04af0c3524d7bf2bce579e92b20e611ca4ca641ce · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

intercropping · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.