Claim · model-written summary
SIF indicators had an AGPP prediction root mean square error of 414.7 gC·m −2 ·year −1.
- Taxon
- vegetatione1
- Outcome
- root mean square errore0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 414.7 gC·m −2 ·year −1e0
- Comparator
- LAI- and EVI-based indicatorse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier
Verbatim
e0“SIF-based indicators exhibited the highest accuracy (Pearson's r = 0.79; root mean square error = 414.7 gC·m −2 ·year −1 ), outperforming LAI- and EVI-based indicators”
t0“phenology and physiology”
e1“vegetation physiology, particularly the seasonal maximum gross primary production, plays a more dominant role in regulating AGPP than phenology”
Title
Hanliang Gui; Qinchuan Xin; Xuewen Zhou; et al. Forest Ecosystems 2025. doi:10.1016/j.fecs.2025.100375
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Method / resource SIF indicators had the highest AGPP prediction accuracy, with Pearson r of 0.79.
- Association Vegetation physiology, especially seasonal maximum gross primary production, had a more dominant role than phenology in AGPP variability.
- Method / resource Globally, SIF-derived phenology indicators were lower than LAI and EVI indicators.
- Method / resource SIF-derived physiology indicators were elevated in tropical regions and the Southern Hemisphere.