Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil and foliar zinc sulphate significantly improved leaf length, width and leaf-stem ratio in both cultivars.

A claim from Enhancing productivity and quality of fodder maize through soil and foliar zinc nutrition · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and foliar zinc sulphate significantly improved leaf length, width and leaf-stem ratio in both cultivars.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
Soil and foliar applied zinc sulphatee0
Outcome
leaf length, leaf width, leaf stem ratioe0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
both the cultivars testede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Verbatim

e0

“Soil and foliar applied zinc sulphate had significantly improved green fodder, dry matter yield and quality parameters viz leaf length, leaf width, leaf stem ratio of both the cultivars tested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–799
t0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50

Title

Enhancing productivity and quality of fodder maize through soil and foliar zinc nutrition

Rakesh Kumar; D. K. Rathore; B. S. Meena; et al. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 2016. doi:10.18805/ijare.v50i3.10747

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-91b09d49f04f4fcdb8fa31bbf3bb7fa4459e0ea2c657b8e6556638fc1f782b3c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

56 papers: 52 positive, 4 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

application · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

337 papers: 310 positive, 27 negative or no effect

309 papers in the same direction as this claim · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

328 papers more in this group

See all 337 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.