Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cowpea intercropping significantly reduced tomato bacterial wilt.

A claim from Effects of intercropping and soil amendment with urea and calcium oxide on the incidence of bacterial wilt of tomato and survival of soil‐borne Pseudomonas solanacearum in Taiwan · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea intercropping significantly reduced tomato bacterial wilt.

Treatment
intercropping tomato with cowpea planted within the rowe0
Interactor
cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0other
Outcome
At AVRDC, intercropping tomato with cowpea planted within the row significantly reduced bacterial wilt ( P < 0.05) compared to when tomato was cropped alone.e0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
tomato was cropped alonee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · InteractorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At AVRDC, intercropping tomato with cowpea planted within the row significantly reduced bacterial wilt ( P < 0.05) compared to when tomato was cropped alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–418

Title

Effects of intercropping and soil amendment with urea and calcium oxide on the incidence of bacterial wilt of tomato and survival of soil‐borne Pseudomonas solanacearum in Taiwan

V. V. MICHEL; J.‐F. WANG; D. J. MIDMORE; et al. Plant Pathology 1997. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3059.1997.d01-45.x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-930f052d704a4e1aec2e517cdfabb756b6058c8c338b1324d5e056ef8a11674a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Vigna unguiculata · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.