Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Muriate of potash did not benefit alfalfa establishment, regardless of placement.

A claim from Band versus Broadcast Fertilization of Alfalfa1 · 1959

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Muriate of potash did not benefit alfalfa establishment, regardless of placement.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
muriate of potashe3
Outcome
establishmente3
Direction
did not benefite3
Qualifier
Regardless of placemente3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Banded superphosphate caused much greater seedling growth of alfalfa than the same amounts mixed with the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–119
e3

“Regardless of placement, limestone or muriate of potash did not benefit establishment but later were very effective in maintaining stands and yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–320

Title

Band versus Broadcast Fertilization of Alfalfa1

B. A. Brown Agronomy Journal 1959. doi:10.2134/agronj1959.00021962005100120004x

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-933d62945df3b44ae902f1ce886918a663ed75737d5dccf1f14cbbb26632696b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

potassium chloride · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.