Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Atrazine followed by one hand weeding at 30 DAS gave maize kernel yield comparable to twice hand weeding.

A claim from Effect of Weed Management Practices in Rabi Maize and their Residual Effect on Succeeding Greengram · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine followed by one hand weeding at 30 DAS gave maize kernel yield comparable to twice hand weeding.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
atrazine @ 1.0 kg a.i ha-1 as pre emergence fb one HW at 30 DAS (T1)e0
Outcome
kernel yielde1
Direction
comparablee1
Comparator
hand weeding twice at 15 and 30 DASe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“atrazine @ 1.0 kg a.i ha-1 as pre emergence fb one HW at 30 DAS (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1144
e1

“The higher kernel yield of maize was recorded with hand weeding twice at 15 and 30 DAS (T9), which was however comparable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–856

Title

Effect of Weed Management Practices in Rabi Maize and their Residual Effect on Succeeding Greengram

B. Sandhya Rani; V. Chandrika; G. Prabhakara Reddy; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.812.107

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-936b2a950cb7dfbbe9b106af114a6ffdb0956f1f320df4e25c4877e463267b2c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

231 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.