Paper · 1976 · Agronomy Journal

Planting Corn in Sod and Small Grain Residues with Minimum Tillage1

W. K. Robertson; H. W. Lundy; G. M. Prine; et al.

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract High costs of labor, fuel, and machinery; need to conserve moisture; loss of soil from erosion; and desire to double crop are some of the factors considered in the trend towards no‐tillage methods of planting crops. No‐tillage planting of corn in Pensacola bahiagrass ( Paspalum notatum Flugge) sod and small grains such as rye ( Secale cereale L.) was compared to conventional planting “rotavating, disking, and planting” for 3 years on Lakeland fine sand (Typic Quartzipsamment). When Pensacola bahiagrass was treated with paraquat + residual herbicide before planting corn by the notillage method, it recovered quickly and competed with the corn for water and nutrients. Corn ( Zea mays L.) planted no‐tillage had lower yields than when conventionally planted, but after corn harvest the bahiagrass growth was adequate for grazing. Adding extra N to the no‐tillage corn increased yields of both corn and grass. Corn under no‐tillage in rye treated with paraquat + residual herbicides generally yielded about the same as conventionally planted corn. Pensacola bahiagrass when treated with glyphosate in combination with other herbicide was almost all killed and offered little competition to the corn. Forage yield in the fall was only 37% of yield after paraquat‐residual herbicide application. The effectiveness in controlling broadleaf weeds with atrazine, cyanazine, alachor, linuron, and combinations of these herbicides varied seasonally, but had no significant effect on corn yields. Weed growth at corn harvest was considerably less on the no‐tillage plots; however, after 3 years of continuous no‐tillage corn perennial weeds were beginning to appear while few perennial weeds were observed in the conventionally planted corn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage corn had lower yields than conventionally planted corn.

Treatment
no‐tillagee1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
conventionally plantede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.) planted no‐tillage had lower yields than when conventionally planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding extra N to no-tillage corn increased yields of both corn and bahiagrass.

Treatment
extra Ne2
Outcome
yields of both corn and grasse2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Adding extra N to the no‐tillage corn increased yields of both corn and grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–921 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage corn in rye treated with paraquat plus residual herbicides generally yielded about the same as conventionally planted corn.

Treatment
paraquat + residual herbicidese3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
about the samee3
Comparator
conventionally planted corne3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Corn under no‐tillage in rye treated with paraquat + residual herbicides generally yielded about the same as conventionally planted corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1059 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pensacola bahiagrass recovered quickly after paraquat plus residual herbicide and competed with corn for water and nutrients.

Interactor
Pensacola bahiagrasse0weed
Outcome
competed with the corn for water and nutrientse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn in Pensacola bahiagrass ( Paspalum notatum Flugge) sod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–307 · show in text ↑
e4

“it recovered quickly and competed with the corn for water and nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pensacola bahiagrass treated with glyphosate in combination with other herbicide was almost all killed and offered little competition to corn.

Treatment
glyphosate in combination with other herbicidee5
Interactor
Pensacola bahiagrasse5weed
Outcome
almost all killede5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Pensacola bahiagrass when treated with glyphosate in combination with other herbicide was almost all killed and offered little competition to the corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1211 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall forage yield of Pensacola bahiagrass was only 37% of its yield after paraquat-residual herbicide application.

Taxon
Pensacola bahiagrasse0
Outcome
Forage yield in the falle6
Direction
lowerinferrede6
Value
37%e6
Comparator
yield after paraquat‐residual herbicide applicatione6

Verbatim

e0

“corn in Pensacola bahiagrass ( Paspalum notatum Flugge) sod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–307 · show in text ↑
e6

“Forage yield in the fall was only 37% of yield after paraquat‐residual herbicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1305 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effectiveness of atrazine, cyanazine, alachor, linuron and their combinations in controlling broadleaf weeds varied seasonally.

Treatment
atrazine, cyanazine, alachor, linurone7
Interactor
broadleaf weedse7weed
Outcome
effectiveness in controlling broadleaf weedse7
Direction
varied seasonallye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The effectiveness in controlling broadleaf weeds with atrazine, cyanazine, alachor, linuron, and combinations of these herbicides varied seasonally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1454 · show in text ↑
e0

“but had no significant effect on corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine, cyanazine, alachor, linuron and their combinations had no significant effect on corn yields.

Treatment
atrazine, cyanazine, alachor, linurone7
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The effectiveness in controlling broadleaf weeds with atrazine, cyanazine, alachor, linuron, and combinations of these herbicides varied seasonally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1454 · show in text ↑
e0

“but had no significant effect on corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed growth at corn harvest was considerably less on no-tillage plots.

Treatment
no‐tillagee1
Outcome
Weed growthe1
Direction
lesse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Weed growth at corn harvest was considerably less on the no‐tillage plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perennial weeds began to appear after three years of continuous no-tillage corn, while few were observed in conventionally planted corn.

Treatment
continuous no‐tillage corne2
Interactor
perennial weedse2weed
Outcome
perennial weedse2
Direction
beginning to appeare2
Comparator
conventionally planted corne2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“after 3 years of continuous no‐tillage corn perennial weeds were beginning to appear while few perennial weeds were observed in the conventionally planted corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1586–1745 · show in text ↑

paraquat · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

16 papers: 8 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 205 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

cyanazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 24 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

linuron · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

tillage · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 65 positive, 46 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 500 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.