Paper · 1995 · Agronomy Journal

Integrating Mechanical Weeding with Reduced Herbicide Use in Conservation Tillage Corn Production Systems

Douglas D. Buhler; Jerry D. Doll; Richard T. Proost; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
69
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Integrated weed management for conservation tillage systems is needed so producers can minimize the environmental impacts of crop production while maintaining effective weed control and profitability. Reduced levels of herbicides and rotary hoeing were evaluated in combination with interrow cultivation for weed control in corn ( Zea mays L.) planted into chisel‐plowed or untilled seedbeds. Atrazine [6‐chloro‐ N ‐ethyl‐ N' ‐(1‐methylethyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine‐2,4‐diamine] at 1.1 kg a.i. ha −1 or cyanazine{2‐[[4‐chloro‐6‐(ethylamino)‐l,3,5‐triazin‐2‐yl]amino]‐2‐methylpropanenitrile} at 1.7 kg a.i. ha −1 applied within 2 d after corn planting greatly reduced weed growth compared with no herbicide use. These reduced herbicide treatments often controlled weeds as well as a standard full‐rate treatment (atrazine at 1.6 kg ha −1 plus 2.0 kg a.i. ha −1 metolachlor [2‐chloro‐ N ‐(2‐ethyl‐6‐methylphenyl)‐ N ‐(2‐methoxy‐l‐methylethyl) acetamide]) prior to cultivation in both tillage systems. In the chisel‐plow experiment, rotary hoeing was not as effective as atrazine or cyanazine in reducing early‐season weed growth. In most cases, one or two interrow cultivations following atrazine or cyanazine increased weed control and corn grain yield to levels similar to the full‐rate treatment in both the chisel‐plow and no‐tillage systems. Integrating interrow cultivation with reduced levels of herbicide maintained weed control and corn yield compared with the full‐rate treatment and is an effective weed management option for corn planted in conservation tillage systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine at 1.1 kg a.i. ha −1 greatly reduced weed growth versus no herbicide.

Treatment
Atrazinee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
no herbicide usee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Atrazine [6‐chloro‐ N ‐ethyl‐ N' ‐(1‐methylethyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine‐2,4‐diamine] at 1.1 kg a.i. ha −1 or cyanazine{2‐[[4‐chloro‐6‐(ethylamino)‐l,3,5‐triazin‐2‐yl]amino]‐2‐methylpropanenitrile} at 1.7 kg a.i. ha −1 applied within 2 d after corn planting greatly reduced weed growth compared with no herbicide use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyanazine at 1.7 kg a.i. ha −1 greatly reduced weed growth versus no herbicide.

Treatment
cyanazinee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
no herbicide usee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cyanazine{2‐[[4‐chloro‐6‐(ethylamino)‐l,3,5‐triazin‐2‐yl]amino]‐2‐methylpropanenitrile} at 1.7 kg a.i. ha −1 applied within 2 d after corn planting greatly reduced weed growth compared with no herbicide use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced herbicide treatments often controlled weeds as well as the standard full-rate treatment before cultivation.

Treatment
reduced herbicide treatmentse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlled weedse0
Direction
as well ase0
Comparator
standard full‐rate treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These reduced herbicide treatments often controlled weeds as well as a standard full‐rate treatment (atrazine at 1.6 kg ha −1 plus 2.0 kg a.i. ha −1 metolachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotary hoeing was less effective than atrazine or cyanazine at reducing early-season weed growth in the chisel-plow experiment.

Treatment
rotary hoeinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
early‐season weed growthe0
Direction
not as effectivee0
Comparator
atrazine or cyanazinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the chisel‐plow experiment, rotary hoeing was not as effective as atrazine or cyanazine in reducing early‐season weed growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One or two interrow cultivations after atrazine or cyanazine increased weed control to a level similar to the full-rate treatment.

Treatment
one or two interrow cultivations following atrazine or cyanazinee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
full‐rate treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In most cases, one or two interrow cultivations following atrazine or cyanazine increased weed control and corn grain yield to levels similar to the full‐rate treatment in both the chisel‐plow and no‐tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One or two interrow cultivations after atrazine or cyanazine increased corn grain yield to a level similar to the full-rate treatment.

Treatment
one or two interrow cultivations following atrazine or cyanazinee0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
full‐rate treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In most cases, one or two interrow cultivations following atrazine or cyanazine increased weed control and corn grain yield to levels similar to the full‐rate treatment in both the chisel‐plow and no‐tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1344 · show in text ↑

atrazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

202 papers: 197 positive, 5 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

cyanazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

cyanazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.