Paper · 1993 · Weed Technology

Reduced Rates of Postemergence Herbicides for Weed Control in Sweet Corn (Zea mays)

John O'Sullivan; William J. Bouw

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The efficacy of reduced rates of POST herbicides for weed control in sweet corn was evaluated over a three-year period in field studies conducted at the Horticultural Experiment Station, Simcoe, Ontario. POST applications of metolachlor/cyanazine, cyanazine/atrazine and metolachlor/atrazine at 1/2X and 1/4X of labelled rates controlled broadleaf weeds comparable to that of standard labelled rates. Control exceeded 94% each year. Annual grass control was reduced with below-label rates, especially for cyanazine/atrazine and metolachlor/atrazine. A 1/2X application of nicosulfuron/rimsulfuron, following the 1/4X rate of cyanazine/atrazine, significantly improved grass control, compared to cyanazine/atrazine applied alone. Below-label rates did not result in decreased sweet corn yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half and quarter labeled rates of three herbicide mixtures controlled broadleaf weeds comparably to standard rates.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
POST applications of metolachlor/cyanazine, cyanazine/atrazine and metolachlor/atrazine at 1/2X and 1/4X of labelled ratese0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse0weed
Outcome
broadleaf weedse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
standard labelled ratese0

Verbatim

e0

“POST applications of metolachlor/cyanazine, cyanazine/atrazine and metolachlor/atrazine at 1/2X and 1/4X of labelled rates controlled broadleaf weeds comparable to that of standard labelled rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadleaf weed control exceeded 94% each year.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Outcome
Controle0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
94%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Control exceeded 94% each year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–431 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Below-label herbicide rates reduced annual grass control.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
below-label ratese0
Interactor
Annual grasse0weed
Outcome
Annual grass controle0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Annual grass control was reduced with below-label rates, especially for cyanazine/atrazine and metolachlor/atrazine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–548 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A half-rate nicosulfuron/rimsulfuron treatment after quarter-rate cyanazine/atrazine significantly improved grass control versus cyanazine/atrazine alone.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
1/2X application of nicosulfuron/rimsulfuron, following the 1/4X rate of cyanazine/atrazinee0
Interactor
grasse0weed
Outcome
grass controle0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
cyanazine/atrazine applied alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“A 1/2X application of nicosulfuron/rimsulfuron, following the 1/4X rate of cyanazine/atrazine, significantly improved grass control, compared to cyanazine/atrazine applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Below-label rates did not decrease sweet corn yields.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
Below-label ratese0
Outcome
sweet corn yieldse0
Direction
did not result in decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Below-label rates did not result in decreased sweet corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–792 · show in text ↑

atrazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

202 papers: 197 positive, 5 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

cyanazine · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

rimsulfuron · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

metolachlor · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

nicosulfuron · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

atrazine · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 69 positive, 17 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

cyanazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.