Paper · 1982 · Agronomy Journal

Weed Control in Corn Planted into Untilled Winter Wheat Stubble1

Orvin C. Burnside; Gail A. Wicks

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract As reduced tillage production systems expand in the Great Plains, a critical need will be non‐tillage methods for controlling established weeds prior to planting the crop. This research dealt with finding selective weed control methods for corn ( Zea mays L.) in an ecofarming system consisting of a winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)‐corn‐fallow rotation on a Sharpsburg silty clay loam (Typic Argiudolls) at Lincoln and a Holdrege silt loam (Typic Argiustolls) at North Platte, Nebraska. Both established and subsequently emerging weed species must be selectively controlled without tillage in order to better conserve the soil, water, energy, and labor requirements in this marginal corn production area. This research has as an objective the moving of dryland corn production further west in the Great Plains region. Adequate control of annual grass weeds as a group was more difficult than control of broadleaf weeds. The more difficult to control weed species were velvetleaf ( Abutilon theophrasti Medic.), fall panicum ( Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx.), large crabgrass [ Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.], and clammy groundcherry ( Physalis heterophylla Nees). Weed yields were the lowest and corn yields were the highest on plots receiving atrazine [2‐chloro‐4‐(ethylamino)‐6‐(isopropylamino)‐ s ‐triazine] at 2.2 kg/ha, cyanazine (2‐[[4‐chloro‐6‐(ethylamino)‐ s ‐triazin‐2‐yl]amino]‐2‐methyl‐propionitrile) at 2.8 kg/ha, or a combination of the two at 0.9 + 1.9 kg/ha. Four foliar‐active herbicide treatments—2,4‐D [(2,4‐dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] at 1.1 kg/ha, 2,4‐D at 1.1 kg/ha + 9.4 liters/ha Sunspray 11E oil, paraquat (1,1'‐dimethyl‐4,4'‐bipyridinium ion) at 0.3 kg/ha, and glyphosate [ N ‐(phosphonomethyl)glycine] at 0.6 kg/ha—were equally effective for controlling established weeds and maintaining high corn yields when combined with the s ‐triazine herbicides. The no‐till farmer has a number of herbicides available which will selectively destroy established and subsequently germinating weed species in corn without tillage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual grasses were harder to control than broadleaf weeds.

Outcome
control of annual grass weedse0
Direction
more difficulte0
Comparator
broadleaf weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adequate control of annual grass weeds as a group was more difficult than control of broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four named weed species were especially difficult to control.

Outcome
more difficult to control weed speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The more difficult to control weed species were velvetleaf ( Abutilon theophrasti Medic.), fall panicum ( Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx.), large crabgrass [ Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.], and clammy groundcherry ( Physalis heterophylla Nees)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine at 2.2 kg/ha produced lowest weed yield and highest corn yield.

Treatment
atrazine [2‐chloro‐4‐(ethylamino)‐6‐(isopropylamino)‐ s ‐triazine] at 2.2 kg/hae0
Outcome
Weed yieldse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed yields were the lowest and corn yields were the highest on plots receiving atrazine [2‐chloro‐4‐(ethylamino)‐6‐(isopropylamino)‐ s ‐triazine] at 2.2 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyanazine at 2.8 kg/ha produced lowest weed yield.

Treatment
cyanazine (2‐[[4‐chloro‐6‐(ethylamino)‐ s ‐triazin‐2‐yl]amino]‐2‐methyl‐propionitrile) at 2.8 kg/hae0
Outcome
Weed yieldse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed yields were the lowest and corn yields were the highest on plots receiving atrazine [2‐chloro‐4‐(ethylamino)‐6‐(isopropylamino)‐ s ‐triazine] at 2.2 kg/ha, cyanazine (2‐[[4‐chloro‐6‐(ethylamino)‐ s ‐triazin‐2‐yl]amino]‐2‐methyl‐propionitrile) at 2.8 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined atrazine and cyanazine produced lowest weed yield.

Treatment
a combination of the two at 0.9 + 1.9 kg/hae0
Outcome
Weed yieldse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed yields were the lowest and corn yields were the highest on plots receiving atrazine [2‐chloro‐4‐(ethylamino)‐6‐(isopropylamino)‐ s ‐triazine] at 2.2 kg/ha, cyanazine (2‐[[4‐chloro‐6‐(ethylamino)‐ s ‐triazin‐2‐yl]amino]‐2‐methyl‐propionitrile) at 2.8 kg/ha, or a combination of the two at 0.9 + 1.9 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four foliar herbicide treatments equally controlled established weeds and maintained high corn yield with triazines.

Treatment
Four foliar‐active herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
controlling established weeds and maintaining high corn yieldse0
Direction
equally effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four foliar‐active herbicide treatments—2,4‐D [(2,4‐dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] at 1.1 kg/ha, 2,4‐D at 1.1 kg/ha + 9.4 liters/ha Sunspray 11E oil, paraquat (1,1'‐dimethyl‐4,4'‐bipyridinium ion) at 0.3 kg/ha, and glyphosate [ N ‐(phosphonomethyl)glycine] at 0.6 kg/ha—were equally effective for controlling established weeds and maintaining high corn yields when combined with the s ‐triazine herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1894 · show in text ↑

atrazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

202 papers: 197 positive, 5 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

cyanazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.