Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Other tank mixes reduced giant foxtail control below 78% at 26 DAT.

A claim from Rimsulfuron Plus Thifensulfuron-Methyl Combinations with Selected Postemergence Broadleaf Herbicides in Corn (Zea mays)1 · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other tank mixes reduced giant foxtail control below 78% at 26 DAT.

Taxon
Corn (Zea mays)Zea mayst0
Treatment
Rimsulfuront0
Interactor
giant foxtaile0weed
Outcome
control of giant foxtaile0
Direction
reducede0
Value
less than 78%e0
Qualifier
26 d after treatment (DAT)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced the control of giant foxtail to less than 78% 26 d after treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1119
t0

“Rimsulfuron Plus Thifensulfuron-Methyl Combinations with Selected Postemergence Broadleaf Herbicides in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–119

Title

Rimsulfuron Plus Thifensulfuron-Methyl Combinations with Selected Postemergence Broadleaf Herbicides in Corn (Zea mays)1

MARK A. ISAACS; HENRY P. WILSON; JOE E. TOLER Weed Technology 2002. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2002)016[0664:rptmcw]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-ca2afce426aa91bad941be34a2f89695343e8fe4245a01afd91d9d343775f4ae · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

rimsulfuron · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.