Paper · 2004 · Weed Technology

Triazine-Resistant Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) Control in Corn with Preemergence Herbicides

Andrew J. Chomas; James J. Kells

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (TR-CHEAL) is a widespread weed problem in the northcentral United States. Field studies were conducted from 1995 to 1997 to determine the efficacy and consistency of metolachlor, pendimethalin, and acetochlor applied preemergence (PRE) for control of TR-CHEAL in corn. Pendimethalin provided greater (98%) and more consistent control of TR-CHEAL than metolachlor (66%) or acetochlor (86%). Studies were conducted from 1998 to 2000 to examine the potential of isoxaflutole, flumetsulam, and rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron for control of TR-CHEAL in corn. In 1999 and 2000, isoxaflutole (35 g ai/ha), flumetsulam (35 g ai/ ha), and rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron (26 g ai/ha) provided 98% or greater control of TR-CHEAL. In 1998 when rainfall was limited after application, isoxaflutole (70 g ai/ha) and flumetsulam (70 g ai/ha) provided 65 and 55% control, respectively, and rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron (26 g ai/ha) provided 55% control. Results indicate that control of TR-CHEAL with currently labeled PRE herbicides is possible.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin controlled triazine-resistant lambsquarters more consistently and strongly than metolachlor or acetochlor.

Treatment
Pendimethaline0t0
Interactor
TR-CHEALe0t0weed
Outcome
control of TR-CHEALe0t0
Direction
greatere0t0
Value
98%e0t0
Qualifier
metolachlor (66%) or acetochlor (86%)e0t0
Comparator
metolachlore0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pendimethalin provided greater (98%) and more consistent control of TR-CHEAL than metolachlor (66%) or acetochlor (86%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–429 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoxaflutole at 35 g ai/ha gave at least 98% lambsquarters control in 1999 and 2000.

Treatment
isoxaflutole (35 g ai/ha)e0t0
Interactor
TR-CHEALe0t0weed
Outcome
control of TR-CHEALe0t0
Direction
98% or greatere0t0
Value
98% or greatere0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1999 and 2000, isoxaflutole (35 g ai/ha), flumetsulam (35 g ai/ ha), and rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron (26 g ai/ha) provided 98% or greater control of TR-CHEAL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flumetsulam at 35 g ai/ha gave at least 98% lambsquarters control in 1999 and 2000.

Treatment
flumetsulam (35 g ai/ ha)e0t0
Interactor
TR-CHEALe0t0weed
Outcome
control of TR-CHEALe0t0
Direction
98% or greatere0t0
Value
98% or greatere0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1999 and 2000, isoxaflutole (35 g ai/ha), flumetsulam (35 g ai/ ha), and rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron (26 g ai/ha) provided 98% or greater control of TR-CHEAL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron at 26 g ai/ha gave at least 98% lambsquarters control in 1999 and 2000.

Treatment
rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron (26 g ai/ha)e0t0
Interactor
TR-CHEALe0t0weed
Outcome
control of TR-CHEALe0t0
Direction
98% or greatere0t0
Value
98% or greatere0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1999 and 2000, isoxaflutole (35 g ai/ha), flumetsulam (35 g ai/ ha), and rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron (26 g ai/ha) provided 98% or greater control of TR-CHEAL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With limited rainfall in 1998, isoxaflutole at 70 g ai/ha gave 65% lambsquarters control.

Treatment
isoxaflutole (70 g ai/ha)e0t0
Outcome
controle0t0
Value
65e0t0
Qualifier
rainfall was limited after applicatione0t0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1998 when rainfall was limited after application, isoxaflutole (70 g ai/ha) and flumetsulam (70 g ai/ha) provided 65 and 55% control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With limited rainfall in 1998, flumetsulam at 70 g ai/ha gave 55% lambsquarters control.

Treatment
flumetsulam (70 g ai/ha)e0t0
Outcome
controle0t0
Value
55%e0t0
Qualifier
rainfall was limited after applicatione0t0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1998 when rainfall was limited after application, isoxaflutole (70 g ai/ha) and flumetsulam (70 g ai/ha) provided 65 and 55% control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With limited rainfall in 1998, rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron gave 55% lambsquarters control.

Treatment
rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron (26 g ai/ha)e0t0
Outcome
controle0t0
Value
55%e0t0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron (26 g ai/ha) provided 55% control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that currently labelled preemergence herbicides can control triazine-resistant lambsquarters.

Treatment
currently labeled PRE herbicidese0t0
Interactor
TR-CHEALe0t0weed
Outcome
control of TR-CHEALe0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of TR-CHEAL with currently labeled PRE herbicides is possible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑

Flumetsulam · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

rimsulfuron · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

isoxaflutole · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Flumetsulam · physiology: gas exchange · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pendimethalin · physiology: gas exchange · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

thifensulfuron · physiology: gas exchange · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.