Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The sequential PRE and POST program controlled all weeds by more than 85%.

A claim from Comparison of Mesotrione Combinations with Standard Weed Control Programs in Corn · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sequential PRE and POST program controlled all weeds by more than 85%.

Treatment
S -metolachlor plus atrazine PRE fb nicosulfuron plus rimsulfuron plus atrazine POSTe0
Interactor
weed speciese0weed
Outcome
controlled all weed speciese0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S -metolachlor plus atrazine PRE fb nicosulfuron plus rimsulfuron plus atrazine POST controlled all weed species greater than 85%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1733
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–81

Title

Comparison of Mesotrione Combinations with Standard Weed Control Programs in Corn

Cory M. Whaley; Gregory R. Armel; Henry P. Wilson; et al. Weed Technology 2006. doi:10.1614/wt-05-042r1.1

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-cb7bca7cd39ff53aa2db40328033e988be918a06d9732706077c231dcaa9fd76 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

atrazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

202 papers: 197 positive, 5 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

193 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

metolachlor · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

nicosulfuron · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.