Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Supplementation with manual weeding or paraquat directed spray increased maize productivity.

A claim from Tillage and crop establishment practices for improving productivity of maize (Zea mays) under different weed control methods · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementation with manual weeding or paraquat directed spray increased maize productivity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Supplementation with manual weeding or paraquat directed spraye2
Outcome
productivity of maizee2
Direction
highere2
Setting
New Delhie1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield performance of maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–198
e1

“A field experiment was conducted during rainy season 2004 and 2005 at New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79
e2

“Supplementation with manual weeding or paraquat directed spray after a month of growth was necessary to achieve season-long control of weeds and higher productivity of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1741–1914

Title

Tillage and crop establishment practices for improving productivity of maize (Zea mays) under different weed control methods

Ranjeet Singh; Archana Sharma; U.K. Behera The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2007

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-2c2bef2f60334afb92f1a7cea5aca5c003899d83d95cedd39b371574d66c95dd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

paraquat · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

16 papers: 8 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this claim · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

620 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this claim · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

642 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.