Paper · 1992 · 中華農業研究

Effects of Shielded Spray of Paraquat and Glyphosate on the Growth and Yield of Corn (Zea mays L.)

Chwen‐Ming Yang; Fu-Chou Chang; Li-Hua Pai; et al.

15
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in the fall crop of 1990 and the spring crop of 1991 to evaluate growth and yield of corn (Zea mays L. cv. Tainung No.1) in responses to paraquat and glyphosate, with or without shielding, applied at three different times in the vegetative stage. Although weed control was improved, herbicide applications at 2, 4 or 6 weeks after planting (WAP) slightly reduced corn growth and yield relative to those of handweeding treatments, but higher than the weedy check. Without proper shielding, the growth and yield of corn was further decreased due to plant injury. Compared to the shielded ones, plant height and leaf area of unshielded corn plants at the 50% silking were declined more than 10% and 20% by paraquat and 15% and 25% by glyphosate applied at 2, 4 or 6 WAP in both 1990 and 1991. Whereas, more than 50% and 60% corn yield reductions were found by applications of paraquat and glyphosate, respectively, in the two seasons. When analyzing the yield characters, it was shown that, without shielding, ear weight and kernel weight were decreased in the spring crop. The effective plant percentage (EPP) was affected by herbicide applications, especially under unshielded conditions. Weed control practices applied as early as 2 WAP ensuing uniform tasseling and silking while glyphosate lengthened the 50% tasseling and silking dates when applied without shielding before 4 WAP. It is therefore suggested that applications of paraquat and glyphosate, if necessary, in the corn field should be with proper shieldings to eliminate corn injury. Paraquat, 1,1'-dimethy 1-4, 4'-bipyridinium dichloride glyphosate;N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide applications improved weed control.

Treatment
herbicide applications at 2, 4 or 6 weeks after planting (WAP)e0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although weed control was improved, herbicide applications at 2, 4 or 6 weeks after planting (WAP) slightly reduced corn growth and yield relative to those of handweeding treatments, but higher than the weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides slightly reduced corn growth and yield versus handweeding.

Treatment
herbicide applications at 2, 4 or 6 weeks after planting (WAP)e0
Outcome
corn growth and yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
handweeding treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicide applications at 2, 4 or 6 weeks after planting (WAP) slightly reduced corn growth and yield relative to those of handweeding treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide-treated corn growth and yield exceeded weedy check.

Treatment
herbicide applications at 2, 4 or 6 weeks after planting (WAP)e0
Outcome
corn growth and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although weed control was improved, herbicide applications at 2, 4 or 6 weeks after planting (WAP) slightly reduced corn growth and yield relative to those of handweeding treatments, but higher than the weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lack of shielding further decreased growth and yield.

Treatment
Without proper shieldinge0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Without proper shielding, the growth and yield of corn was further decreased due to plant injury.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unshielded paraquat decreased plant height by more than 10%.

Treatment
paraquate0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
declinede0
Value
more than 10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height and leaf area of unshielded corn plants at the 50% silking were declined more than 10% and 20% by paraquat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unshielded paraquat decreased leaf area by more than 20%.

Treatment
paraquate0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
declinede0
Value
20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height and leaf area of unshielded corn plants at the 50% silking were declined more than 10% and 20% by paraquat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unshielded glyphosate decreased plant height by 15%.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
declinede0
Value
15%e0
Comparator
shielded onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the shielded ones, plant height and leaf area of unshielded corn plants at the 50% silking were declined more than 10% and 20% by paraquat and 15% and 25% by glyphosate applied at 2, 4 or 6 WAP in both 1990 and 1991.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unshielded glyphosate decreased leaf area by 25%.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
declinede0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
shielded onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the shielded ones, plant height and leaf area of unshielded corn plants at the 50% silking were declined more than 10% and 20% by paraquat and 15% and 25% by glyphosate applied at 2, 4 or 6 WAP in both 1990 and 1991.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat reduced corn yield by more than 50%.

Treatment
paraquate0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
more than 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more than 50% and 60% corn yield reductions were found by applications of paraquat and glyphosate, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate reduced corn yield by more than 60%.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more than 50% and 60% corn yield reductions were found by applications of paraquat and glyphosate, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without shielding, spring-crop ear and kernel weight decreased.

Treatment
without shieldinge0
Outcome
ear weight and kernel weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without shielding, ear weight and kernel weight were decreased in the spring crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides affected effective plant percentage, especially without shielding.

Treatment
herbicide applicationse0
Outcome
effective plant percentage (EPP)e0
Qualifier
especially under unshielded conditionse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effective plant percentage (EPP) was affected by herbicide applications, especially under unshielded conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control at two weeks produced uniform tasseling and silking.

Treatment
Weed control practices applied as early as 2 WAPe0
Outcome
uniform tasseling and silkinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control practices applied as early as 2 WAP ensuing uniform tasseling and silking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unshielded glyphosate before four weeks delayed 50% tasseling and silking.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
50% tasseling and silking datese0
Direction
lengthenede0
Qualifier
without shielding before 4 WAPe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glyphosate lengthened the 50% tasseling and silking dates when applied without shielding before 4 WAP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat and glyphosate should be properly shielded in corn fields.

Outcome
should be with proper shieldings to eliminate corn injurye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applications of paraquat and glyphosate, if necessary, in the corn field should be with proper shieldings to eliminate corn injury.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1579 · show in text ↑

paraquat · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

16 papers: 8 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

glyphosate · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

25 papers: 12 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

77 papers: 42 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

paraquat · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

herbicide · phenology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.