Paper · 2014 · Advances in Agriculture

Weed Control and Corn (Zea mays) Response to Planting Pattern and Herbicide Program with High Seeding Rates in North Carolina

Mitchell K. Williams; Ronnie W. Heiniger; Wesley J. Everman; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Effective weed control in corn ( Zea mays L.) is important to optimize yield. Concern over environmental impact of atrazine and selection for glyphosate resistance has increased the need to develop alternative strategies that use herbicides other than atrazine and glyphosate and appropriate cultural practices to control weeds. Research was conducted during 2011 and 2012 to determine weed and corn response to herbicide programs containing dicamba, glufosinate, and glyphosate applied postemergence alone or with atrazine in single- and twin-row planting patterns. Planting pattern had no effect on common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) and Texas panicum ( Panicum texanum L.) population and did not interact with herbicide program. Effective weed control hastened maturity in some but not all instances. Under weed-free conditions, corn grain yield was higher in 5 of 7 trials when planted in twin rows versus single rows at equivalent corn populations (141,000 plants ha −1 ). These results suggest that while planting pattern may not impact weed control dramatically, planting corn in twin rows may be an effective alternative to single-row planting patterns because of increased yield under high corn populations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting pattern did not affect common ragweed population.

Treatment
Planting patterne0
Interactor
Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.Ambrosia artemisiifoliae0weed
Outcome
common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.)e0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ambrosia artemisiifolia
Ambrosia artemisiifolia · InteractorDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting pattern had no effect on common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) and Texas panicum ( Panicum texanum L.) population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–696 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting pattern did not affect Texas panicum population.

Treatment
Planting patterne0
Interactor
Panicum texanum L.Urochloa texanae0weed
Outcome
Texas panicum ( Panicum texanum L.) populatione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Urochloa texana
Urochloa texana · InteractorSam Kieschnick · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting pattern had no effect on common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) and Texas panicum ( Panicum texanum L.) population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–696 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting pattern did not interact with herbicide program.

Outcome
did not interact with herbicide programe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not interact with herbicide program”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–740 · show in text ↑
e1

“Planting pattern had no effect on common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) and Texas panicum ( Panicum texanum L.) population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–696 · show in text ↑
e2

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective weed control hastened corn maturity in some instances.

Treatment
Effective weed controle0
Outcome
maturitye0
Direction
hastenede0
Qualifier
in some but not all instancese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effective weed control hastened maturity in some but not all instances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–812 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under weed-free conditions, twin-row corn had higher yield than single-row corn in five of seven trials.

Treatment
twin rowse0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5 of 7 trialse0
Qualifier
141,000 plants ha −1e0
Comparator
single rowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under weed-free conditions, corn grain yield was higher in 5 of 7 trials when planted in twin rows versus single rows at equivalent corn populations (141,000 plants ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–986 · show in text ↑

herbicide · phenology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.