Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Corn yield reduction was 1.5 times greater with proportional volume at the 12.5% rate.

A claim from Effect of Carrier Volume on Corn (Zea mays) and Soybean (Glycine max) Response to Simulated Drift of Glyphosate and Glufosinate1 · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield reduction was 1.5 times greater with proportional volume at the 12.5% rate.

Treatment
spray volume was varied proportionallye0
Outcome
corn yield reductione0
Direction
greatere0
Value
1.5 timese0
Comparator
constant spray volumee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with constant spray volume, corn yield reduction was 1.5 times greater for the 12.5% rate but 4 times greater for the 6.3% rate when spray volume was varied proportionally to the herbicide rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1274

Title

Effect of Carrier Volume on Corn (Zea mays) and Soybean (Glycine max) Response to Simulated Drift of Glyphosate and Glufosinate1

JEFFREY M. ELLIS; JAMES L. GRIFFIN; CURTIS A. JONES Weed Technology 2002. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2002)016[0587:eocvoc]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-a618ffcfdff47befbec7760a059fda2566c98d5dc17d3ba641d6c1a7ee6c8935 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this claim · 575 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

620 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.