Paper · 2017 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Combining Urease and Nitrification Inhibitors with Incorporation Reduces Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide Emissions and Increases Corn Yields

Craig F. Drury; Xueming Yang; W. Dan Reynolds; et al.

14
claims
33
verbatim quotes
119
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Less than 50% of applied nitrogen (N) fertilizer is typically recovered by corn ( Zea mays L.) due to climatic constraints, soil degradation, overapplication, and losses to air and water. Two application methods, two N sources, and two inhibitors were evaluated to reduce N losses and enhance crop uptake. The treatments included broadcast urea (BrUrea), BrUrea with a urease inhibitor (BrUrea+UI), BrUrea with a urease and a nitrification inhibitor (BrUrea+UI+NI), injection of urea ammonium nitrate (InjUAN), and injected with one or both inhibitors (InjUAN+UI, InjUAN+UI+NI), and a control. The BrUrea treatment lost 50% (64.4 kg N ha −1 ) of the applied N due to ammonia volatilization, but losses were reduced by 64% with BrUrea+UI+NI (23.0 kg N ha −1 ) and by 60% with InjUAN (26.1 kg N ha −1 ). Ammonia losses were lower and crop yields were greater in 2014 than 2013 as a result of the more favorable weather when N was applied in 2014. When ammonia volatilization was reduced by adding a urease inhibitor, N 2 O emissions were increased by 30 to 31% with BrUrea+UI and InjUAN+UI compared with BrUrea and InjUAN, respectively. Pollution swapping was avoided when both inhibitors were used (BrUrea+UI+NI, InjUAN+UI+NI) as both ammonia volatilization and N 2 O emissions were reduced, and corn grain yields increased by 5% with BrUrea+UI+NI and by 7% with InjUAN+UI+NI compared with BrUrea and InjUAN, respectively. The combination of two N management strategies (InjUAN+UI+NI) increased yields by 19% (12.9 t ha −1 ) compared with BrUrea (10.8 t ha −1 ). Core Ideas Ammonia volatilization resulted in 50% loss of applied urea over 2 yr. When urease inhibitors were added with urea, ammonia volatilization was reduced by 64%. Injection of UAN reduced ammonia volatilization by 60% compared with broadcast urea. N 2 O emissions were increased by 30 to 31% when urease inhibitors were applied. Pollution swapping was avoided when both urease and nitrification inhibitors were used.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast urea lost half its applied nitrogen as ammonia.

Treatment
BrUreae0
Outcome
applied N due to ammonia volatilizatione0
Direction
loste0
Value
50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The BrUrea treatment lost 50% (64.4 kg N ha −1 ) of the applied N due to ammonia volatilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–689 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BrUrea with both inhibitors reduced ammonia loss by 64% relative to BrUrea.

Treatment
BrUrea+UI+NIe0
Outcome
lossese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
64%e0
Comparator
BrUreae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“losses were reduced by 64% with BrUrea+UI+NI (23.0 kg N ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–758 · show in text ↑
e1

“The BrUrea treatment lost 50% (64.4 kg N ha −1 ) of the applied N due to ammonia volatilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–689 · show in text ↑
e2

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injected UAN reduced ammonia loss by 60% relative to broadcast urea.

Treatment
InjUANe0
Outcome
ammonia volatilizatione3
Direction
reducede3
Value
60%e3
Comparator
broadcast ureae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by 60% with InjUAN (26.1 kg N ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–800 · show in text ↑
e1

“The BrUrea treatment lost 50% (64.4 kg N ha −1 ) of the applied N due to ammonia volatilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–689 · show in text ↑
e2

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–94 · show in text ↑
e3

“Injection of UAN reduced ammonia volatilization by 60% compared with broadcast urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1815 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonia losses were lower in 2014 than 2013.

Outcome
Ammonia lossese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
2013e0
Setting
2014e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonia losses were lower and crop yields were greater in 2014 than 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–874 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop yields were greater in 2014 than 2013.

Outcome
crop yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
2013e0
Setting
2014e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonia losses were lower and crop yields were greater in 2014 than 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–874 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BrUrea with urease inhibitor raised nitrous oxide emissions by 30 to 31%.

Treatment
BrUrea+UIe0
Outcome
N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30 to 31%e0
Comparator
BrUreae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N 2 O emissions were increased by 30 to 31% with BrUrea+UI and InjUAN+UI compared with BrUrea and InjUAN, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1133 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injected UAN with urease inhibitor raised nitrous oxide emissions by 30 to 31%.

Treatment
InjUAN+UIe0
Outcome
N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30 to 31%e0
Comparator
InjUANe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N 2 O emissions were increased by 30 to 31% with BrUrea+UI and InjUAN+UI compared with BrUrea and InjUAN, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1133 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both inhibitors reduced ammonia volatilization with broadcast urea.

Treatment
BrUrea+UI+NIe1
Outcome
ammonia volatilizatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both ammonia volatilization and N 2 O emissions were reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1289 · show in text ↑
e1

“both inhibitors were used (BrUrea+UI+NI, InjUAN+UI+NI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1225 · show in text ↑
e2

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both inhibitors reduced nitrous oxide emissions with broadcast urea.

Treatment
BrUrea+UI+NIe1
Outcome
N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both ammonia volatilization and N 2 O emissions were reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1289 · show in text ↑
e1

“both inhibitors were used (BrUrea+UI+NI, InjUAN+UI+NI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1225 · show in text ↑
e2

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both inhibitors reduced ammonia volatilization with injected UAN.

Treatment
InjUAN+UI+NIe1
Outcome
ammonia volatilizatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both ammonia volatilization and N 2 O emissions were reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1289 · show in text ↑
e1

“both inhibitors were used (BrUrea+UI+NI, InjUAN+UI+NI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1225 · show in text ↑
e2

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both inhibitors reduced nitrous oxide emissions with injected UAN.

Treatment
InjUAN+UI+NIe1
Outcome
N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both ammonia volatilization and N 2 O emissions were reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1289 · show in text ↑
e1

“both inhibitors were used (BrUrea+UI+NI, InjUAN+UI+NI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1225 · show in text ↑
e2

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BrUrea with both inhibitors raised corn grain yield by 5%.

Treatment
BrUrea+UI+NIe0
Outcome
corn grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5%e0
Comparator
BrUreae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn grain yields increased by 5% with BrUrea+UI+NI and by 7% with InjUAN+UI+NI compared with BrUrea and InjUAN, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1420 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injected UAN with both inhibitors raised corn grain yield by 7%.

Treatment
InjUAN+UI+NIe0
Outcome
corn grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7%e0
Comparator
InjUANe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn grain yields increased by 5% with BrUrea+UI+NI and by 7% with InjUAN+UI+NI compared with BrUrea and InjUAN, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1420 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injected UAN with both inhibitors raised yield by 19% relative to broadcast urea.

Treatment
InjUAN+UI+NIe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19%e0
Qualifier
10.8 t ha −1e0
Comparator
BrUreae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“InjUAN+UI+NI) increased yields by 19% (12.9 t ha −1 ) compared with BrUrea (10.8 t ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1560 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–94 · show in text ↑

urea ammonium nitrate · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

urea ammonium nitrate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 18 positive, 7 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

transplanting · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

130 papers: 88 positive, 42 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

126 papers more in this group

See all 130 papers →

transplanting · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

application · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 45 positive, 21 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

625 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.