Paper · 2009 · Global Change Biology

Nitrous oxide fluxes from corn fields: on‐farm assessment of the amount and timing of nitrogen fertilizer

B. L. MA; T. Y. WU; N. TREMBLAY; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
225
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Nitrogen fertilization is considered as an important source of atmospheric N 2 O emission. A seven site‐year on‐farm field experiment was conducted at Ottawa and Guelph, ON and Saint‐Valentin, QC, Canada to characterize the affect of the amount and timing of N fertilizer on N 2 O emission in corn ( Zea mays L.) production. Using the static chamber method, gas samples were collected for 28‐days after preplant and 28‐days after sidedress fertilization at the seven site‐year, resulting in 14 monitoring periods. For both methods of fertilization, peak N 2 O flux and cumulative emission increased with the amount of N applied, with rates ranging from 30 to 900 μg N m −2 h −1 . Depending on N amount and time of application, cumulative emission varied from 0.05 to 2.42 kg N ha −1 , equivalent to 0.03% to 1.45% of the N fertilizer applied. Differences in N 2 O emission peaks among fertilizer treatments were clearly separated in 13 out of 14 monitoring periods. Total N 2 O emissions may have been underestimated compared with annual monitoring in 10 out of the 49 cases because the monitoring period ended before N 2 O efflux returned to the baseline level. The flux of N 2 O was negligible when soil mineral N in the 0–15 cm layer was < 20 mg N kg −1 . While rainfall stimulated emission, soil temperature > 15 °C was likely the driving force responsible for the higher levels of N 2 O found for sidedress than preplant application methods. However, caution must be taken when interpreting these later results as preplant fertilization may have continuously stimulated N 2 O emissions after the 28‐days monitoring period, especially in situations where N 2 O effluxes have not fallen back to their baseline levels. Increasing fertilizer rates from 90 to 150 kg N ha −1 resulted in slight increases in yields, but doubled cumulative N 2 O emissions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peak N2O flux increased with applied nitrogen amount under both fertilization timings.

Treatment
amount of N appliede0
Outcome
peak N 2 O fluxe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30 to 900 μg N m −2 h −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For both methods of fertilization, peak N 2 O flux and cumulative emission increased with the amount of N applied, with rates ranging from 30 to 900 μg N m −2 h −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–688 · show in text ↑
e1

“N 2 O emission in corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–332 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumulative N2O emissions increased with applied nitrogen amount under both fertilization timings.

Treatment
amount of N appliede0
Outcome
cumulative emissione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.05 to 2.42 kg N ha −1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For both methods of fertilization, peak N 2 O flux and cumulative emission increased with the amount of N applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–636 · show in text ↑
e1

“Depending on N amount and time of application, cumulative emission varied from 0.05 to 2.42 kg N ha −1 , equivalent to 0.03% to 1.45% of the N fertilizer applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–851 · show in text ↑
e2

“N 2 O emission in corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–332 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emission peaks differed clearly among fertilizer treatments in 13 of 14 monitoring periods.

Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
Differences in N 2 O emission peakse0
Value
13 out of 14 monitoring periodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in N 2 O emission peaks among fertilizer treatments were clearly separated in 13 out of 14 monitoring periods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–974 · show in text ↑
e1

“N 2 O emission in corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–332 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 28-day monitoring period may have underestimated annual N2O emissions in 10 of 49 cases.

Outcome
Total N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
underestimatede0
Value
10 out of the 49 casese0
Comparator
annual monitoringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total N 2 O emissions may have been underestimated compared with annual monitoring in 10 out of the 49 cases because the monitoring period ended before N 2 O efflux returned to the baseline level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1171 · show in text ↑
e1

“N 2 O emission in corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–332 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2O flux was negligible when surface soil mineral N was below 20 mg N kg−1.

Outcome
flux of N 2 Oe0
Direction
negligiblee0
Qualifier
soil mineral N in the 0–15 cm layer was < 20 mg N kg −1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The flux of N 2 O was negligible when soil mineral N in the 0–15 cm layer was < 20 mg N kg −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“N 2 O emission in corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–332 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall stimulated N2O emissions.

Treatment
rainfalle0
Outcome
emissione0
Direction
stimulatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While rainfall stimulated emission”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1302 · show in text ↑
e1

“N 2 O emission in corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–332 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil temperature above 15°C was proposed to drive higher N2O levels for sidedress than preplant fertilization.

Treatment
sidedresse0
Outcome
levels of N 2 Oe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
soil temperature > 15 °Ce0
Comparator
preplant application methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil temperature > 15 °C was likely the driving force responsible for the higher levels of N 2 O found for sidedress than preplant application methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1455 · show in text ↑
e1

“N 2 O emission in corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertilizer from 90 to 150 kg N ha−1 slightly increased corn yield.

Treatment
150 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
slight increasese0
Comparator
90e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing fertilizer rates from 90 to 150 kg N ha −1 resulted in slight increases in yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1822 · show in text ↑
e1

“N 2 O emission in corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertilizer from 90 to 150 kg N ha−1 doubled cumulative N2O emissions.

Treatment
150 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
cumulative N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
doublede0
Comparator
90e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing fertilizer rates from 90 to 150 kg N ha −1 resulted in slight increases in yields, but doubled cumulative N 2 O emissions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1863 · show in text ↑
e1

“N 2 O emission in corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–332 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 45 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.