Paper · 2024 · Field Crops Research

Combining measurements and modelling to reveal long-term effects of nitrogen fertilizer application timing on N2O emissions in corn

Jongwon Kang; Pedro Vitor Ferrari Machado; David Hooker; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The impact of nitrogen fertilizer (N) application timing on nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions is inconsistent in the literature. This inconsistency is attributed to year-to-year weather variations, which affect soil conditions around N application time. Planting dates (PD) also vary year-to-year based on weather, and PD can influence N timing decisions. The study aims to evaluate: i) the long-term effects of different N application timings on N 2 O emissions and, ii) how variations in PD influence the relative performance of different N timing strategies. We used the DeNitirifcation-DeComposition (DNDC) model, calibrated with field measurements from Elora, Ontario, Canada, to simulate 39 growing seasons using historical weather data. Three N timing strategies were tested: spring application one day before planting, in-season application at the V6 growth stage, and a split-N strategy with N applied at both times. PDs were either dynamically adjusted each year based on rainfall or fixed to one of three typical corn ( Zea mays L.) planting dates in Ontario: April 25, May 5, and May 15. For the first objective, the long-term simulation found that average N 2 O emissions were greatest when N was applied at V6 (3.2 kg N ha −1 ) compared to when N was applied pre-plant (2.3 kg N ha −1 ) or split-applied (2.0 kg N ha −1 ). This was caused by slightly greater rainfall around V6 than planting. For the second objective, the relative performance of different N-timing strategies was affected by PD. Earlier PDs resulted in lower N₂O emissions compared to later PDs, primarily due to lower soil temperatures around the time of N fertilizer application. Earlier PDs also led to the largest differences in N 2 O emissions among the N timing strategies, with PD delays leading to smaller differences among N timing strategies. Large single N applications, particularly those applied in-season, resulted in greater N 2 O emissions than split and at-planting N applications in a long-term simulation. Early PDs consistently reduced N 2 O emissions by creating less favourable conditions for N 2 O production. Moreover, the relative performance of N timing strategies was mediated by PD. This study highlights the interconnected nature of cropping systems, where one management practice, PD, can influence a seemingly unrelated outcome, N 2 O emissions. Long-term climatic, social, economic, and technological changes that influence PD will also influence N 2 O emissions from spring and summer-applied N fertilizer. • Early planting dates reduce N 2 O emissions from nitrogen applications. • Split nitrogen applications result in the lowest average N 2 O emissions. • N 2 O emissions peak with large nitrogen applications at the V6 growth stage. • Effect of nitrogen timing on N2O emissions depends on planting date. • Long-term simulations can reveal the true effect of different fertilizer strategies for emission reduction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Applying N at V6 gave the greatest average N2O emissions, above pre-plant N, in the long-term simulation.

Treatment
N was applied at V6e1
Outcome
average N 2 O emissionse1
Direction
greateste1
Value
3.2 kg N ha −1e1
Comparator
pre-plante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“N2O emissions in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“average N 2 O emissions were greatest when N was applied at V6 (3.2 kg N ha −1) compared to when N was applied pre-plant (2.3 kg N ha −1) or split-applied (2.0 kg N ha −1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1159–1333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier planting dates lowered N2O emissions compared with later planting dates.

Treatment
Earlier PDse2
Outcome
N₂O emissionse2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
later PDse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“N2O emissions in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–131 · show in text ↑
e2

“Earlier PDs resulted in lower N₂O emissions compared to later PDs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1574 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier planting dates produced the largest differences in N2O emissions among the N timing strategies.

Treatment
Earlier PDse3
Outcome
differences in N 2 O emissions among the N timing strategiese3
Direction
largeste3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“N2O emissions in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–131 · show in text ↑
e3

“Earlier PDs also led to the largest differences in N 2 O emissions among the N timing strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Split N applications gave the lowest average N2O emissions among the N timing strategies.

Treatment
Split nitrogen applicationse5
Outcome
average N 2 O emissionse5
Direction
loweste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“N2O emissions in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–131 · show in text ↑
e5

“Split nitrogen applications result in the lowest average N 2 O emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2596–2668 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Large single in-season N applications gave greater N2O emissions than split and at-planting applications in a long-term simulation.

Treatment
Large single N applications, particularly those applied in-seasone6
Outcome
N 2 O emissionse6
Direction
greatere6
Comparator
split and at-planting N applicationse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“N2O emissions in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–131 · show in text ↑
e6

“Large single N applications, particularly those applied in-season, resulted in greater N 2 O emissions than split and at-planting N applications in a long-term simulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1833–2003 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The relative performance of N timing strategies was affected by planting date.

Treatment
PDe4
Outcome
relative performance of different N-timing strategiese4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“N2O emissions in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–131 · show in text ↑
e4

“the relative performance of different N-timing strategies was affected by PD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1507 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 45 positive, 21 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.