Paper · 2013 · Net Journal of Agricultural Science

Growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in response to herbicide application in the coastal savannah ecozone of Ghana

E. Larbi; J. Ofosu-Anim; J.C. Norman; et al.

5
claims
18
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted at the University of Ghana, Legon farm from June to September 2005 to investigate the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays) in response to herbicide application. Four groups of herbicides; 2,4-D (Bextra and Calliherbe), glyphosate (Kalach 360SL, Fire and Weed Out), Atrazine (Callitraz 500SC and Trazine 500SC) and Paraquat (Gramoxone Super and Benaxone) were used. Each of the named herbicides constituted a treatment, with hand weeding as the control. In all, there were ten treatments and four replicates arranged in a randomized complete block design. Paraquat and gyphosate treatments were applied before sowing; Atrazine and 2,4-D were applied two days after sowing. The compound fertilizer 15-15-15 (N-P-K) at the rate of 250 kg/ha was applied as side dressing 2 WAP. Top dressing with sulphate of ammonia at rate of 125 kg/ha was applied 6 WAP. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the data was carried out using (Genstat 5 statistical package, 1997). Significant differences between means were estimated by the Least Significant Difference at 5% level of significance. Results revealed that dry matter accumulation, leaf area were similar in all treatments across the sample period. Glyphosate, Paraquat and Atrazine treatment had dry matter accumulation similar to the control. 2,4-D treatment however had higher dry matter at 2 WAP. Although there was no difference in the number of kernels per plant among the various treatments 2,4-D treatment plots produced 33 to 41% less as compared to the control in yield per hectare.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter accumulation and leaf area of maize were similar across all herbicide treatments and hand-weeded control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
herbicide applicatione1
Outcome
dry matter accumulation, leaf areae4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
hand weedinge2
Setting
Legon farme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field studies were conducted at the University of Ghana, Legon farm from June to September 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“to investigate the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays) in response to herbicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–188 · show in text ↑
e2

“Each of the named herbicides constituted a treatment, with hand weeding as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–480 · show in text ↑
e4

“dry matter accumulation, leaf area were similar in all treatments across the sample period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate, Paraquat and Atrazine gave maize dry matter accumulation similar to the hand-weeded control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Glyphosate, Paraquat and Atrazinee5
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Comparator
controle5
Setting
Legon farme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field studies were conducted at the University of Ghana, Legon farm from June to September 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“to investigate the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays) in response to herbicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–188 · show in text ↑
e3

“Four groups of herbicides; 2,4-D (Bextra and Calliherbe), glyphosate (Kalach 360SL, Fire and Weed Out), Atrazine (Callitraz 500SC and Trazine 500SC) and Paraquat (Gramoxone Super and Benaxone)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–382 · show in text ↑
e5

“Glyphosate, Paraquat and Atrazine treatment had dry matter accumulation similar to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D gave higher maize dry matter at 2 weeks after planting.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
2,4-De3
Outcome
dry mattere6
Direction
highere6
Qualifier
at 2 WAPe6
Setting
Legon farme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field studies were conducted at the University of Ghana, Legon farm from June to September 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“to investigate the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays) in response to herbicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–188 · show in text ↑
e3

“Four groups of herbicides; 2,4-D (Bextra and Calliherbe), glyphosate (Kalach 360SL, Fire and Weed Out), Atrazine (Callitraz 500SC and Trazine 500SC) and Paraquat (Gramoxone Super and Benaxone)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–382 · show in text ↑
e6

“2,4-D treatment however had higher dry matter at 2 WAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of kernels per plant of maize did not differ among the herbicide treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
various treatmentse7
Outcome
number of kernels per plante7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7
Setting
Legon farme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field studies were conducted at the University of Ghana, Legon farm from June to September 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“to investigate the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays) in response to herbicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–188 · show in text ↑
e7

“Although there was no difference in the number of kernels per plant among the various treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D reduced maize yield per hectare by 33 to 41% compared with the hand-weeded control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
2,4-De2
Outcome
yield per hectaree2
Direction
lesse2
Value
33 to 41%e2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
Legon farme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field studies were conducted at the University of Ghana, Legon farm from June to September 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“to investigate the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays) in response to herbicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–188 · show in text ↑
e2

“2,4-D treatment plots produced 33 to 41% less as compared to the control in yield per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1558 · show in text ↑

paraquat · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

16 papers: 8 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

2,4-D · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

46 papers: 37 positive, 9 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

77 papers: 42 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 205 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 30 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 500 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.