Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by sulfosulfuron gave the highest test weight versus other herbicide applications.

A claim from Analysis of regional disparity in agricultural development of Chhattisgarh · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by sulfosulfuron gave the highest test weight versus other herbicide applications.

Treatment
pendimethalin fb sulfosulfurone1
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
39.41ge0
Comparator
other herbicide applicationse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This herbicide combination resulted in maximum plant height (100.98cm), number of effective spikes/m2 (283.56), number of grains/spike (61.92), test weight (39.41g), grain yield (4.26 t/ha), net return (Rs. 38936/ha) and B:C ratio (2.01) compared to other herbicide applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1230
e1

“was similar to use of pendimethalin fb sulfosulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–950
e2

“complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–167

Title

Analysis of regional disparity in agricultural development of Chhattisgarh

Aryama Bharti; Urmila Bhagat Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2020

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-93ff86d2391ce3c8c2d58c47087ce15be78f96bf909c274b52797108585e06ec · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

pendimethalin · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.