Claim · model-written summary
Barley plants grown in soil with disturbed microbiome did not recover two weeks after re-watering.
- Taxon
- Barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- soil with disturbed microbiomee0
- Outcome
- did not recovere0
- Qualifier
- two weeks after re-wateringe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Plants grown in the soil with disturbed microbiome were significantly more affected by drought and did not recover two weeks after re-watering”
t0“Barley”
Title
Luhua Yang; Peter Schröder; Gisle Vestergaard; et al. Microorganisms 2020. doi:10.3390/microorganisms8091414
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Barley growth was not significantly affected by disturbance of the soil microbiome under regular watering.
- Intervention effect After drought stress barley plant biomass was significantly reduced, particularly in the root system.
- Intervention effect Barley plants grown in soil with disturbed microbiome were significantly more affected by drought.
- Observation These effects were accompanied by changes in the composition of endophytic fungal and bacterial communities.
- Observation Under natural conditions, soil-derived endophytes such as Glycomyces and Fusarium were major colonizers of barley roots.
- Observation In plants grown in soil with disturbed microbiome, seed-borne bacterial endophytes such as Pantoea, Erwinia and unclassified Pseudomonaceae were found.
- Observation In plants grown in soil with disturbed microbiome, fungal genera normally associated with pathogenesis, such as Gibberella and Gaeumannomyces, were observed.
- Recommendation The authors recommend considering the composition of the indigenous soil microbiota in future management strategies to make plants more resistant to abiotic stress such as drought.