Claim · model-written summary
Earlier environmental conditions controlled the timing of growth maxima.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The incidence of the maxima is controlled by environmental conditions—not by the environmental conditions operating at the time, but by those obtaining at some previous stage in the life‐history of the plant”
e1“for maize throughout its life‐cycle”
Title
A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLANT GROWTH: PART I.
G. E. BRIGGS; FRANKLIN KIDD; CYRIL WEST Annals of Applied Biology 1920. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1920.tb05107.x
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Relative growth rate varied markedly and systematically over the maize life cycle.
- Observation The maize growth-rate curve had an initial fall and two subsidiary maxima on its descending limb.
- Mechanism Before assimilatory organs offset respiratory dry-weight loss, maize growth was negative or nil.
- Observation Leaf area per unit dry weight rose to a maximum during phase B-C.
- Observation Leaf area per unit dry weight declined continuously through phase C-F.
- Association The first subsidiary growth maximum coincided with male flower appearance.
- Association The second subsidiary growth maximum coincided with female flower appearance.
- Association Growth minima preceded the maxima and coincided with earliest flower development.
- Association Leaf area per dry weight corresponded with relative growth rate over the season.
- Observation Maize seedling leaves did not perform normal assimilation until after emergence.