Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation at 60 cm depth gave the lowest water use efficiency

A claim from EFFECT OF WATER APPLICATION LEVELS AND DIFFERENT WETTING DEPTHS ON SUGARBEET YIELD AND ITS WATER RELATIONS AT NORTH DELTA · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: SUGARBEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment: irrigated at depth of 60 cme2
Outcome: water use efficiencye1
Direction: loweste2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris* · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0
“SUGARBEET YIELD”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–82

e1
“Irrigation at 30 cm of soil moisture depth (D1) achieved the highest values of water use efficiency for both sugarbeet and sugar yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1743–1877

e2
“While the lowest values were obtained from treatment D3 (irrigated at depth of 60 cm)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1932–2017

Title

EFFECT OF WATER APPLICATION LEVELS AND DIFFERENT WETTING DEPTHS ON SUGARBEET YIELD AND ITS WATER RELATIONS AT NORTH DELTA

H. Shams El-Din, Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2000. doi:10.21608/jssae.2000.259737

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Field capacity irrigation gave the highest sugarbeet yield of 20.17 ton/fed
Intervention effect Field capacity +5% irrigation gave the lowest sugarbeet yield of 18.52 ton/fed
Intervention effect Soil moisture depth of 30 cm gave the highest sugarbeet yield and root weight per plant
Intervention effect Soil moisture depth of 30 cm gave the highest sugar yield, 3419.55 and 3791.49 kg/fed in the two seasons
Intervention effect Field capacity plus 5% treatment had the highest water consumptive use, 2479.4 and 2563.34 m3/fed
Intervention effect Water applied was highest at field capacity +5% irrigation
Intervention effect Water applied was lowest at field capacity -5% irrigation
Intervention effect Field capacity -5% irrigation gave the highest water use efficiency for sugarbeet and sugar yield
Intervention effect Field capacity +5% irrigation gave the lowest water use efficiency
Intervention effect Soil moisture depth of 30 cm gave the highest water use efficiency for sugarbeet and sugar yield
Observation Most soil moisture extraction occurred in the upper soil surface layer
Observation About 70% of available soil moisture was extracted by roots from the first 0-30 cm
Observation About 30% of available soil moisture was extracted from the second foot of soil profile
Observation Moisture extraction by roots decreased substantially with soil depth

Record rev-965d22f533dfd18d82a423d3070ec377fa4bdc5aa28bea149174ada781560a2e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

irrigation · physiology: water · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 33 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction

positive
Irrigation at 80% of ASMD saved 17.8% of irrigation water, against 4.1% and 3.4% root and sugar yield reductions compared with 40% of ASMD.
EEFECT OF IRRIGATION AT DIFFERENT SOIL MOISTURE DEPLETION LEVELS AND RATES OF POTASSIUM FERTILIZATION ON PRODUCTIVITY AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY OF SUGAR BEET · 2008 · compared with irrigation at 40% of ASMD
Opposite directionCites this paper
positive
Root yield irrigation water use efficiency reached 16.16 kg/m3 under T4 drip and 9 kg/m3 under furrow irrigation.
Evaluation and Comparison of Drip and Conventional Irrigation Methods on Sugar Beets in a Semiarid Region · 2011 · compared with CFI
Opposite direction
positive
One irrigation before major July stress promoted high water use efficiency.
Suitability of Sugarbeets for Limited Irrigation in a Semi‐arid Climate¹ · 1980
Opposite direction
positive
PRD increased sugar beet irrigation water use efficiency by 34.9% compared with FI.
Evaluation of water use and yield responses of drip-irrigated sugar beet with different irrigation techniques · 2014 · compared with FI
Opposite direction
positive
Deficit irrigation reduced irrigation water requirements.
Regulated Deficit Irrigation at Special Development Stages Increases Sugar Beet Yield · 2019
Opposite direction
positive
Eight day irrigation was superior for water use efficiency.
MAXIMIZING SUGAR BEET YIELD, QUALITY AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY USING SOME AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES UNDER NORTH SINAI CONDITIONS · 2009
Opposite direction
positive
Limited irrigation increased sucrose yield per unit water use by up to 22%.
Water Use and Yields of Sugarbeets Over a Range from Excessive to Limited Irrigation · 1979 · compared with the treatment that matched lysimeter ET
Opposite direction
positive
At full irrigation, furrow water use efficiency was 1.7 times tape irrigation.
Effect of deficit-irrigation management on components and yield of sugar beet · 2012 · compared with tape method
Opposite direction

32 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.

Other papers on the same question

irrigation · physiology: water · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results