Claim · model-written summary
CT-RB had higher soil pH than the other treatments.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the CT-RB recorded higher soil pH as compared to all the other treatments”
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
Title
GULAB SINGH YADAV; M. DATTA; SUBHASH BABU; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v60i3.4485
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Summer maize green cob yield was higher under NT-RF and NT-RB than CT-RF.
- Intervention effect Field pea seed yield was higher under NT-RF and NT-RB than CT-RF.
- Intervention effect Rainy season maize grain yield under NT-RF was 12.66% lower than CT-RF.
- Observation NT-RB gave maximum system productivity of 16.34 t/ha in 201213.
- Observation NT-RB gave maximum system productivity of 14.55 t/ha in 201314.
- Intervention effect Average system productivity was 6.1% higher under NT than CT systems.
- Observation Net returns and benefit:cost ratios followed system productivity trends.
- Intervention effect Soil organic carbon under NT-FB was 13.2% higher than CT-FB.
- Intervention effect Available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were higher under NT than CT systems.
- Recommendation The authors recommend NT-RB for the maize–maize–field pea system to improve productivity, profitability and soil health.