Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Field pea seed yield was higher under NT-RF and NT-RB than CT-RF.

A claim from Effect of tillage and crop-establishment techniques on productivity, profitability and soil health under maize (Zea mays)maizefield pea (Pisum sativum) cropping system · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field pea seed yield was higher under NT-RF and NT-RB than CT-RF.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
NT-RF and NT-RBe0
Outcome
field pea seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
17.932.2%e0
Comparator
CT-RFe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“field pea seed yield was 17.932.2% higher under NT-RF and NT-RB than CT-RF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–775

Title

Effect of tillage and crop-establishment techniques on productivity, profitability and soil health under maize (Zea mays)maizefield pea (Pisum sativum) cropping system

GULAB SINGH YADAV; M. DATTA; SUBHASH BABU; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v60i3.4485

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e54f74bb77ea962fa123890c31dc5aa97398170df292880d08db7b7240dbfb49 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

52 papers: 46 positive, 6 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Irrigation before flowering did not increase pea yield when the soil was at or near field capacity at sowing.

    Some Responses of Peas to Irrigation at Different Growth Stages · 1962

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Irrigation reduced yields of shelled peas.

    EFFECT OF APPLICATION RATES OF DISULFOTON AND PHORATE, AND OF IRRIGATION ON APHID CONTROL AND RESIDUES IN CANNING PEAS · 1967

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    In certain seasons irrigation suppressed yields on some deeper soils.

    Influence of soil type and irrigation on yield of spring‐sown barley and peas and autumn‐sown greenfeed in Canterbury · 1987

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Seed weight was unaffected by irrigation treatments.

    Response of pea seed yield to water deficit. · 2006

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Irrigation every two days reduced pea total yield by 17.29 - 17.06 %.

    Effect of Sowing Dates, Irrigation Intervals and Organic Fertilizers on Growth and Productivity of Pea Plants (Pisum sativum L.) under Sandy Soil Conditions · 2017

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Longer irrigation periods reduced pod number and length in both cultivars.

    Effect of Salt Levels and Irrigation Periods in Some Reproductive Characters and Chemical properties of Seeds of Two Peas (Pisum sativum L.) Cultivars · 2011

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Irrigation mitigated some of the yield reduction at Outlook.

    Effect of heat and precipitation on pea yield and reproductive performance in the field · 2015

    Same direction

  8. positive
    WI gave the best yields.

    Water Stress during Reproductive Stages Affects Seed Quality and Yield of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) · 1997

    Same direction

43 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

tillage · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 53 positive, 16 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Compaction reduced pea yield by up to 60%.

    Mixed Effects of Soil Compaction on the Nitrogen Cycle Under Pea and Wheat · 2022

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Pea yield was lowest under minimum tillage (MinT) than under MT, FP and SP.

    Tillage Effects on Water Use and Grain Yield of Winter Wheat and Green Pea in Rotation · 2008 · compared with MT, FP, and SP

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Compaction reduced pea seed yield by 18% at Grignon.

    Agronomic Performance of Different Pea Cultivars Under Various Sowing Periods and Contrasting Soil Structures · 2008

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Pea yield fell 14% in 1986.

    Effect of soil compaction on growth, yield and light interception of selected crops · 1990

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Soil compaction reduced pea yield by around 45% in 1984.

    Sensitivity of eight cereal and legume species to the compaction status of deep, sandy soils · 1991

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Reduced tillage produced significantly lower pea seed yield, 4.34 t ha−1, than conventional tillage.

    The Nitrogen Fixation and Yielding of Pea in Different Soil Tillage Systems · 2022 · compared with conventional system

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    No-tillage mostly decreased pea yield.

    Soil characteristics and crop yields under different tillage techniques · 2015

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Average field pea seed yields were not always significantly different between tillage systems.

    Field Pea Growth and Nutrient Uptake: Response to Tillage Systems and Nitrogen Fertilizer Applications · 2004

    Opposite direction

60 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.