Intervention effectmodel-written summary

ZSD stabilises fat yield (mean 449.3 kg ha−1) across variable environments.

A claim from Optimizing Soybean Productivity: A Comparative Analysis of Tillage and Sowing Methods and Their Effects on Yield and Quality · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZSD stabilises fat yield (mean 449.3 kg ha−1) across variable environments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
ZSDe6
Outcome
fat yielde6
Direction
stabilizinge6
Value
449.3 kg ha−1e6
Setting
variable environmentse6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimizing soybean yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 63–99
e6

“The present analysis highlights ZSD as an effective method for stabilizing protein yield (mean value 843.8 kg ha−1) and fat yield (mean value 449.3 kg ha−1) across variable environments, supporting the use of ZSD in conservation agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1227

Title

Optimizing Soybean Productivity: A Comparative Analysis of Tillage and Sowing Methods and Their Effects on Yield and Quality

Agnieszka Faligowska; Katarzyna Panasiewicz; Grażyna Szymańska; et al. Agriculture 2025. doi:10.3390/agriculture15060626

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-97802c84ccd8efb9fbe58b28877f7f7afc9138ed68e0b474c3fd580a9adc8d57 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this claim · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

381 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.