Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T4 increased microbial biomass carbon and soil enzyme activities.

A claim from Synergistic effects of nitrogen, sewage sludge, and poultry manure on integrative fertilization for wheat and sugar beet in marginally saline soil · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased microbial biomass carbon and soil enzyme activities.

Treatment
nitrogen, sewage sludge, and poultry manuret0
Outcome
microbial biomass carbon, soil enzyme activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also increased microbial biomass carbon, soil enzyme activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1797
t0

“nitrogen, sewage sludge, and poultry manure on integrative fertilization for wheat and sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–120

Title

Synergistic effects of nitrogen, sewage sludge, and poultry manure on integrative fertilization for wheat and sugar beet in marginally saline soil

Szilvia Veres; Tarek Alshaal; Nevien Elhawat Frontiers in Plant Science 2026. doi:10.3389/fpls.2026.1827328

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-98676fdb31b7a2cc6bb2904d7be9b6fa5e5709ceb48e9419d61837263e5ef8df · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

fertilization · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

82 papers: 77 positive, 5 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

organic · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.