Paper · 2026 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Synergistic effects of nitrogen, sewage sludge, and poultry manure on integrative fertilization for wheat and sugar beet in marginally saline soil

Szilvia Veres; Tarek Alshaal; Nevien Elhawat

13
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction Soil salinity is a major constraint to agricultural productivity in arid and semi-arid regions, affecting approximately 1.4 billion hectares globally (over 10% of the world’s land area) and causing substantial yield losses in staple crops, with reductions reaching up to 50% or more in sensitive species under moderate salinity levels. Methods While the individual effects of biofertilizers or organic amendments have been widely studied, there remains a critical gap in field-based evidence regarding their synergistic integration—particularly the combined use of dual nitrogen (N 2 )-fixing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria ( Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum lipoferum ) with a balanced blend of sewage sludge and poultry manure (1:1 on N basis) as a 50% substitution for inorganic N in marginally saline soils. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of such integrated fertilization on soil health, nutrient availability, physiological performance, and productivity of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Sakha 93) and sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L. cv. Kawemira) in marginally saline soil (initial EC e 3.47 dS/m). A strip-plot field experiment with five treatments was conducted: control (T1), biofertilizer alone (T2), 50% inorganic N + 50% organic manure (T3), biofertilizer + T3 (T4), and conventional NPK (T5). Soil and plant parameters were assessed at 70 days after sowing (DAS), with final yield and quality parameters determined at harvest. Results and discussion Treatment T4 significantly improved soil organic matter (23.3 g/kg in wheat and 22.9 g/kg in sugar beet), reduced EC e (to 3.90 dS/m in wheat and 3.13 dS/m in sugar beet), and enhanced available N (up to 63.0 mg/kg) and potassium. It also increased microbial biomass carbon, soil enzyme activities, photosynthetic rate (14.0 µmol CO 2 /m 2 /s in wheat and 26.5 µmol CO 2 /m 2 /s in sugar beet), and alleviated salinity-induced stress indicators. The highest yields were recorded under T4, with wheat grain yield reaching 6719 kg/ha and sugar beet root yield 78.8 tons/ha, accompanied by superior sugar quality. These results demonstrate that the integration of dual PGPR with blended organic amendments (T4) offers a synergistic, low-input strategy that enhances soil fertility, mitigates salinity stress, and boosts crop productivity while reducing inorganic fertilizer use by 50%. This approach provides a scalable and sustainable solution for marginally saline soils in arid regions, supporting food security with a reduced environmental footprint. Further multi-site and multi-year validation across a wider range of salinity levels and soil types is recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 raised soil organic matter in wheat plots to 23.3 g/kg.

Treatment
Treatment T4e0
Outcome
soil organic mattere0
Direction
improvede0
Value
23.3 g/kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T4 significantly improved soil organic matter (23.3 g/kg in wheat and 22.9 g/kg in sugar beet)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 raised soil organic matter in sugar beet plots to 22.9 g/kg.

Treatment
Treatment T4e0
Outcome
soil organic mattere0
Direction
improvede0
Value
22.9 g/kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T4 significantly improved soil organic matter (23.3 g/kg in wheat and 22.9 g/kg in sugar beet)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 reduced soil ECe in wheat plots to 3.90 dS/m.

Treatment
nitrogen, sewage sludge, and poultry manuret0
Outcome
EC ee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
3.90 dS/me0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced EC e (to 3.90 dS/m in wheat and 3.13 dS/m in sugar beet)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1670 · show in text ↑
t0

“nitrogen, sewage sludge, and poultry manure on integrative fertilization for wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 reduced soil ECe in sugar beet plots to 3.13 dS/m.

Treatment
nitrogen, sewage sludge, and poultry manuret0
Outcome
EC ee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
3.13 dS/me0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced EC e (to 3.90 dS/m in wheat and 3.13 dS/m in sugar beet)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1670 · show in text ↑
t0

“nitrogen, sewage sludge, and poultry manure on integrative fertilization for wheat and sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased available nitrogen to 63.0 mg/kg and potassium.

Treatment
Treatment T4e0
Outcome
available Ne0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
63.0 mg/kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T4 significantly improved soil organic matter (23.3 g/kg in wheat and 22.9 g/kg in sugar beet), reduced EC e (to 3.90 dS/m in wheat and 3.13 dS/m in sugar beet), and enhanced available N (up to 63.0 mg/kg) and potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased soil potassium availability.

Treatment
Treatment T4e0
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T4 significantly improved soil organic matter (23.3 g/kg in wheat and 22.9 g/kg in sugar beet), reduced EC e (to 3.90 dS/m in wheat and 3.13 dS/m in sugar beet), and enhanced available N (up to 63.0 mg/kg) and potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased microbial biomass carbon and soil enzyme activities.

Treatment
nitrogen, sewage sludge, and poultry manuret0
Outcome
microbial biomass carbon, soil enzyme activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also increased microbial biomass carbon, soil enzyme activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1797 · show in text ↑
t0

“nitrogen, sewage sludge, and poultry manure on integrative fertilization for wheat and sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased wheat photosynthetic rate to 14.0 µmol CO 2 /m 2 /s.

Treatment
nitrogen, sewage sludge, and poultry manuret0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
14.0 µmol CO 2 /m 2 /se0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic rate (14.0 µmol CO 2 /m 2 /s in wheat and 26.5 µmol CO 2 /m 2 /s in sugar beet)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1799–1893 · show in text ↑
t0

“nitrogen, sewage sludge, and poultry manure on integrative fertilization for wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased sugar beet photosynthetic rate to 26.5 µmol CO 2 /m 2 /s.

Treatment
nitrogen, sewage sludge, and poultry manuret0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
26.5 µmol CO 2 /m 2 /se0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic rate (14.0 µmol CO 2 /m 2 /s in wheat and 26.5 µmol CO 2 /m 2 /s in sugar beet)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1799–1893 · show in text ↑
t0

“nitrogen, sewage sludge, and poultry manure on integrative fertilization for wheat and sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 alleviated salinity stress indicators.

Treatment
nitrogen, sewage sludge, and poultry manuret0
Outcome
salinity-induced stress indicatorse0
Direction
alleviatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alleviated salinity-induced stress indicators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1899–1944 · show in text ↑
t0

“nitrogen, sewage sludge, and poultry manure on integrative fertilization for wheat and sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 produced the highest wheat grain yield, 6719 kg/ha.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6719 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yields were recorded under T4, with wheat grain yield reaching 6719 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1946–2031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 produced the highest sugar beet root yield, 78.8 tons/ha.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
sugar beet root yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
78.8 tons/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yields were recorded under T4, with wheat grain yield reaching 6719 kg/ha and sugar beet root yield 78.8 tons/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1946–2070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 yielded superior sugar quality.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
sugar qualitye0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yields were recorded under T4, with wheat grain yield reaching 6719 kg/ha and sugar beet root yield 78.8 tons/ha, accompanied by superior sugar quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1946–2109 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

82 papers: 77 positive, 5 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

organic · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

nitrogen · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 23 positive, 6 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 38 positive, 11 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

8 of 14 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.