Paper · 2007 · Compost Science & Utilization

Nitrogen Utilization, Yield, Quality and Soil Properties In a Sugarbeet Crop Amended With Municipal Solid Waste Compost

F. Montemurro; M. Maiorana

12
claims
30
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The aim of this research was to study different ways of nitrogen (N) fertilization and soil tillage management to ensure high yield, quality and correct usage of the available resources. Therefore, a two-year field experiment (2001 and 2003) was carried out on a sugarbeet crop grown in a Mediterranean environment to evaluate the effects of two soil tillage depths (10-15 and 40-45 cm) and of a municipal solid waste (MSW) compost application, compared to mineral N fertilization. The following fertilization treatments were compared: MSW compost at 100 kg N ha−1 (Ncom); mineral N fertilizer at 50 kg ha−1 (N50) and at 100 kg ha−1 (N100); MSW compost combined with mineral N fertilizer (Nmix) (50 kg ha−1 as organic N plus 50 kg ha−1 as mineral N); slow release organic-mineral fertilizer (Nslow) and an unfertilized control (Contr). In each trial year, growth parameters, plant and soil N indicators, yield, quality, N uptake and N efficiency, soil chemical characteristics and N mineral deficit in the soil were determined. The findings of this research highlighted that MSW compost was an important N source for sugarbeet, especially when MSW compost was combined with mineral N fertilizer. In fact, the Nmix treatment did not determine any significant reduction in root (32.5 vs. 36.4 t ha−1 of N100) and sucrose yields (3.56 and 3.65 ha−1). Furthermore, it presented a significantly lower amount of one of the most important qualitative parameters, the alfa amino N (1.74 and 1.97 meq 100 g−1 of N100), and ensured the least soil N deficit in 2003. The application of MSW compost significantly increased the extracted organic carbon in both 2001 (37% of increase for compost treatment in respect to unfertilized control) and 2003 (24%). Higher values were also recorded for total organic carbon in 2001 (20% of increase) and for humified organic carbon in 2001 (27%) and in 2003 (16%), whereas its application did not increase the total content of heavy metals. Finally, among plants and soil N indicators tested, the petiole nitrate content was the only one significantly and positively correlated with root and sucrose yields, indicating that it was an effective tool to monitor N supply.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed compost and mineral fertilizer did not significantly reduce root yield relative to N100.

Treatment
Nmixe0
Outcome
roote0
Direction
did not determine any significant reductione0
Value
32.5e0
Qualifier
36.4 t ha−1e0
Comparator
N100e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Nmix treatment did not determine any significant reduction in root (32.5 vs. 36.4 t ha−1 of N100)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1306 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed fertilizer did not significantly reduce sucrose yield relative to N100.

Treatment
Nmixe0
Outcome
sucrose yieldse0
Direction
did not determine any significant reductione0
Value
3.56e0
Qualifier
3.65 ha−1e0
Comparator
N100e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Nmix treatment did not determine any significant reduction in root (32.5 vs. 36.4 t ha−1 of N100) and sucrose yields (3.56 and 3.65 ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nmix had significantly lower alfa amino N than N100.

Treatment
Nmixe1
Outcome
alfa amino Ne0
Direction
lowere0
Value
1.74e0
Qualifier
1.97 meq 100 g−1e0
Comparator
N100e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it presented a significantly lower amount of one of the most important qualitative parameters, the alfa amino N (1.74 and 1.97 meq 100 g−1 of N100)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1508 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Nmix treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nmix gave the least soil N deficit in 2003.

Treatment
Nmixe1
Outcome
soil N deficite0
Direction
leaste0
Qualifier
2003e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ensured the least soil N deficit in 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1554 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Nmix treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased extracted organic carbon in 2001 by 37%.

Treatment
MSW composte0
Outcome
extracted organic carbone0
Direction
increasede0
Value
37%e0
Qualifier
2001e0
Comparator
unfertilized controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of MSW compost significantly increased the extracted organic carbon in both 2001 (37% of increase for compost treatment in respect to unfertilized control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased extracted organic carbon in 2003 by 24%.

Treatment
MSW composte0
Outcome
extracted organic carbone0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24%e0
Qualifier
2003e0
Comparator
unfertilized controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of MSW compost significantly increased the extracted organic carbon in both 2001 (37% of increase for compost treatment in respect to unfertilized control) and 2003 (24%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1742 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost raised total organic carbon in 2001 by 20%.

Treatment
MSW composte1
Outcome
total organic carbone0
Direction
Highere0
Value
20%e0
Qualifier
2001e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values were also recorded for total organic carbon in 2001 (20% of increase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1827 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of MSW compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost raised humified organic carbon in 2001 by 27%.

Treatment
MSW composte1
Outcome
humified organic carbone0
Direction
Highere0
Value
27%e0
Qualifier
2001e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values were also recorded for total organic carbon in 2001 (20% of increase) and for humified organic carbon in 2001 (27%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1873 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of MSW compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost raised humified organic carbon in 2003 by 16%.

Treatment
MSW composte1
Outcome
humified organic carbone0
Direction
Highere0
Value
16%e0
Qualifier
2003e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values were also recorded for total organic carbon in 2001 (20% of increase) and for humified organic carbon in 2001 (27%) and in 2003 (16%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1891 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of MSW compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost did not increase total heavy metal content.

Treatment
MSW composte1
Outcome
total content of heavy metalse0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its application did not increase the total content of heavy metals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1901–1967 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of MSW compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Petiole nitrate content was the sole tested indicator positively correlated with root and sucrose yields.

Organ / stage
petiolee0
Outcome
root and sucrose yieldse0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the petiole nitrate content was the only one significantly and positively correlated with root and sucrose yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2021–2134 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Petiole nitrate content was identified as an effective N supply monitoring tool.

Outcome
effective tool to monitor N supplye0
Comparator
the only onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the petiole nitrate content was the only one significantly and positively correlated with root and sucrose yields, indicating that it was an effective tool to monitor N supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2021–2196 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 45 positive, 23 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.