Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Adding fomesafen preplant improved Palmer amaranth control to at least 92%, compared with ethalfluralin preplant

A claim from Weed Control, Crop Response, and Profitability When Intercropping Cantaloupe and Cotton · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding fomesafen preplant improved Palmer amaranth control to at least 92%, compared with ethalfluralin preplant

Treatment
The addition of fomesafen preplante2
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle2
Direction
improvede2
Value
at least 92%e2
Comparator
Ethalfluralin applied preplante1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Ethalfluralin applied preplant did not injure cantaloupe or cotton, but Palmer amaranth was not controlled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–611
e2

“The addition of fomesafen preplant improved Palmer amaranth control to at least 92% without injuring cotton, but cantaloupe necrosis and chlorosis of up to 20% was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–785

Title

Weed Control, Crop Response, and Profitability When Intercropping Cantaloupe and Cotton

Peter M. Eure; A. Stanley Culpepper; Rand M. Merchant; et al. Weed Technology 2015. doi:10.1614/wt-d-14-00023.1

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-993a7dfae88da5548cdcb465aadf85db886b67b25c7c888d1e97a520818f405a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer