Claim · model-written summary
Fomesafen preplant did not injure cotton
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume2 - Treatment
- The addition of fomesafen preplante2
- Outcome
- injuring cottone2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“The addition of fomesafen preplant improved Palmer amaranth control to at least 92% without injuring cotton, but cantaloupe necrosis and chlorosis of up to 20% was recorded”
Title
Weed Control, Crop Response, and Profitability When Intercropping Cantaloupe and Cotton
Peter M. Eure; A. Stanley Culpepper; Rand M. Merchant; et al. Weed Technology 2015. doi:10.1614/wt-d-14-00023.1
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Preplant ethalfluralin did not injure cantaloupe or cotton
- Intervention effect Adding fomesafen preplant improved Palmer amaranth control to at least 92%, compared with ethalfluralin preplant
- Intervention effect Cantaloupe necrosis and chlorosis of up to 20% were recorded with fomesafen preplant
- Intervention effect Halosulfuron-methyl was safely applied over cantaloupe
- Intervention effect Residual activity of halosulfuron-methyl reduced cotton growth by 12% at 4 wk after planting
- Intervention effect Halosulfuron-methyl did not improve Palmer amaranth control beyond ethalfluralin plus fomesafen preplant
- Intervention effect Intercropping systems controlling Palmer amaranth at least 92% gave cantaloupe yields similar to the weed-free monoculture
- Intervention effect Intercropping systems controlling Palmer amaranth at least 92% gave lint cotton yields 170 to 275 kg/ha lower than the weed-free monoculture
- Intervention effect Intercropping returns over variable costs exceeded those of cantaloupe monoculture and cotton monoculture while Palmer amaranth was controlled
- Recommendation Intercropping cantaloupe and cotton is an effective approach to improve grower profitability