Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fomesafen at 2,240 g ai ha-1 reduced cotton stand by as much as 83% compared with the nontreated check.

A claim from Evaluation of Cotton Responses to Fomesafen-Based Treatments Applied Preemergence · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fomesafen at 2,240 g ai ha-1 reduced cotton stand by as much as 83% compared with the nontreated check.

Treatment
Fomesafen applied at 2,240 g ai ha −1e1
Outcome
cotton stande1
Direction
reducede1
Value
83%e1
Comparator
nontreated check (NTC)e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–30
e1

“Fomesafen applied at 2,240 g ai ha −1 reduced cotton stand by as much as 83% compared to the nontreated check (NTC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–897

Title

Evaluation of Cotton Responses to Fomesafen-Based Treatments Applied Preemergence

Xiao Li; Timothy Grey; William Vencill; et al. Weed Technology 2018. doi:10.1017/wet.2018.31

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-d93d72bcdf1f3ec3d6bf74b6c3fb1f77ab587deb2e50583660b82ba3aa98d353 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fomesafen · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.