Claim · model-written summary
Frost damage counts were 28 in mossy pine and 159 in ledum.
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
e0“frost damage – 28 and 159”
Title
Analysis of anomalies in the structure and size of annual rings in mossy and ledum pine forests
Anna Khokh Forestry Engineering Journal 2024. doi:10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2023.4/24
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Observation Average, maximum and minimum annual ring widths differed significantly by forest type.
- Observation Ledum pine forests had 3.34 times as many anomalies as mossy pine forests.
- Observation Mossy pine forests had 229 density fluctuations.
- Observation Ledum pine forests had 530 density fluctuations.
- Observation Fallen tree rings numbered 10 in mossy pine and 202 in ledum.
- Observation The most unfavorable radial growth years for mossy pine were 1979 and 1980.
- Observation The most unfavorable radial growth years for ledum pine were 1906 and 1940.
- Observation Mossy pine anomaly maxima occurred in eleven listed years and accounted for 91,4%.
- Observation Ledum pine anomaly maxima occurred in thirteen listed years and accounted for 89.7%.
- Observation The timing of anomalies and growth minima did not coincide between the two pine forest types.
- Association Annual ring structure reflects seasonal growth of common pine.
- Mechanism Soil hydrology largely determines pine ring structural anomalies.