Claim · model-written summary
The authors infer no selection against CNVs during hybridization.
BrassicaNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there is no selection against CNVs in the hybridization event”
t0“Brassica allohexaploid”
Title
Daniela Quezada-Martinez; Poonam Bangia; Jacqueline Batley; et al. Annals of Botany 2025. doi:10.1093/aob/mcaf254
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Crosses produced 9052 new allohexaploid hybrid seeds.
- Association Female and male parent genotypes affected crossing success rate.
- Observation F1 hybrids had mid parent seed fertility heterosis ranging from -64 to 275 %.
- Observation F1 hybrids had best parent seed fertility heterosis ranging from -79 to 241 %.
- Observation Most F1 hybrids had similar amounts of copy number variation events to their parents.
- Observation Most copy number variation events were inherited directly from a parent.
- Observation Combining allohexaploid types by hand pollination was feasible without extra embryo survival measures.
- Observation Novel hybrids had fertility similar to their parents.
- Observation Novel hybrids had stability similar to their parents.
- Association Increased heterozygosity did not immediately improve seed fertility.