Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Film mulching transplanting controlled Echinochloa crusgalli with an overall weed control effect of 86%.

A claim from Preliminary Experiment of Film Mulching Transplanting Technology for Organic Rice · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulching transplanting controlled Echinochloa crusgalli with an overall weed control effect of 86%.

Treatment
film mulching transplantinge0
Interactor
Echinochloa crusgalliEchinochloa crus-gallie0weed
Outcome
weed control effecte0
Direction
bettere0
Value
86%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The film mulching transplanting rice had a better effect on the control of Echinochloa crusgalli and Monochoria and the weed control effect reached 86%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–905

Title

Preliminary Experiment of Film Mulching Transplanting Technology for Organic Rice

MA Wei-xi Ningxia Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology 2013

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-9bd5fe02e3fdb0efb597ceda546231b9925f0e5608bd57741b8f2aa985247116 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

transplanting · Echinochloa crus-galli · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

mulching · Echinochloa crus-galli · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.