Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Shellac coating maintained muskmelon carotenoids at 2034.14 µg/100 g.

A claim from Impact of polysaccharide and lipid based edible coatings on storage life and quality of muskmelon (Cucumis melo) fruits during low temperature storage · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shellac coating maintained muskmelon carotenoids at 2034.14 µg/100 g.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
shellac based coatinge0
Outcome
total carotenoidse0
Direction
maintaine0
Value
2034.14 µg/100 ge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shellac based coating was able to maintain highest mean firmness and biochemical parameters such as total soluble solid (8.53%), acidity, ascorbic acid (4.66 mg/100 g), sugars, total carotenoids (2034.14 µg/100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1151
t0

“muskmelon (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–112

Title

Impact of polysaccharide and lipid based edible coatings on storage life and quality of muskmelon (Cucumis melo) fruits during low temperature storage

BINDU H; SUDHAKAR RAO D V; NARAYANA C K; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2024. doi:10.56093/ijas.v94i9.145772

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-9bfef41e4ef92aa41300d9b725ef3ffcc6ca58cf67393ddbaca4abb3cfad711e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

storage · physiology: pigments · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.