Claim · model-written summary
xopAG and xopC1 were restricted to some A*/A(W) strains.
CitrusNot reportedMaterialCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“two (xopAG and xopC1) were present only in some A*/A(W) strains”
e1“another citrus pathogen”
Title
Aline Escalon; Stéphanie Javegny; Christian Vernière; et al. Molecular Plant Pathology 2013. doi:10.1111/mpp.12019
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Observation Xci strains carried 28 effectors, of which 26 were shared by all strains.
- Observation xopAG occurred in all A(W) strains and three genetically distant A* strains.
- Observation All xopAG-containing strains induced hypersensitive response on grapefruit and sweet orange.
- Association xopAD and xopAG analysis suggested horizontal transfer between X. citri pv. bilvae and some Xci strains.
- Observation A strains were genetically less diverse and had identical phenotypic responses and indistinguishable effector repertoires.
- Association A*/A(W) clades correlated with geographic origin and effector repertoire, but not pathogenicity.